[GOAL] Re: [SCHOLCOMM] Big Deals, Big Macs and Consortial Licensing

2013-11-25 Thread Sandy Thatcher
Stevan continues to be hung up on the idea that some academic authors still have visions of fame and fortune they'd like to achieve through publishing books in the traditional manner, so he believes that the time for OA in book publishing has not yet arrived. But perhaps a simple

[GOAL] Re: [SCHOLCOMM] Big Deals, Big Macs and Consortial Licensing

2013-11-25 Thread Dana Roth
[mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of Sandy Thatcher Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 1:12 PM To: LibLicense-L Discussion Forum Cc: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) Subject: [GOAL] Re: [SCHOLCOMM] Big Deals, Big Macs and Consortial Licensing Stevan continues to be hung up on the idea

[GOAL] Re: [SCHOLCOMM] Big Deals, Big Macs and Consortial Licensing

2013-11-25 Thread Andrew A. Adams
Sandy Thatcher wrote: Stevan continues to be hung up on the idea that some academic authors still have visions of fame and fortune they'd like to achieve through publishing books in the traditional manner, so he believes that the time for OA in book publishing has not yet arrived. But perhaps

[GOAL] Re: [SCHOLCOMM] Big Deals, Big Macs and Consortial Licensing

2013-11-19 Thread Friend, Fred
Stevan's analysis of the way in which open access was developing alongside licensing is very important. We need to understand the way in which OA developed in order to avoid the kind of distortion of OA that emerges from time to time. I was also going through a time of fluid thinking at the