About the display in some journal home pages of both a CC- License and an All
rights reserved statement, Alicia Keys wrote:
One set of licensing terms applies to their generic web content, and the
other to specific
articles that are surfaced via that website. This isn't a conflict in
Jeffrey Beall wrote:
The two biggest problems I see are 1).
Contradictory licensing statements, such as the one shown below
I agree with the previous replies that there's no contradiction in the text
displayed in the image provided.
But I went to the journal's website
I agree with the consensus. I would add that the use of Creative Commons
by itself (e.g. this is published under a Creative Commons licence ) is
frequent and can be seriously misleading. Licensors should always state the
exact variant of the licence.
I'd also suggest we point out that CC-* is a
