]
ENVOYÉ : 11 juin 2015 05:14
À : 'Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)'
CC : frederique.bordig...@enpc.fr; Couture Marc
OBJET : RE: [GOAL] Re: Update on statement against Elsevier's new sharing
policy
Hi Alicia,
One question puzzles me, studying your interventions everywhere
...@enpc.fr; Couture Marc
*Objet :* RE: [GOAL] Re: Update on statement against Elsevier's new
sharing policy
Hi Alicia,
One question puzzles me, studying your interventions everywhere explaining
the changes in policy :
Seems you have the same coach as Erik Merkel-Sobotta, from Springer
Couture
De : Didier Pélaprat [mailto:didier.pelap...@inserm.fr]
Envoyé : 11 juin 2015 05:14
À : 'Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)'
Cc : frederique.bordig...@enpc.fr; Couture Marc
Objet : RE: [GOAL] Re: Update on statement against Elsevier's new sharing
policy
Hi Alicia,
One question
-OXF)
Objet : [GOAL] Re: Update on statement against Elsevier's new sharing policy
Hi Marc,
Apologies for the delay in replying – I have been on the road this week.
The introduction of tags was an idea we developed after consultation with
large, mainly commercial, sharing platforms
[mailto:didier.pelap...@inserm.fr]
Envoyé : 11 juin 2015 05:14
À : 'Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)'
Cc : frederique.bordig...@enpc.fr; Couture Marc
Objet : RE: [GOAL] Re: Update on statement against Elsevier's new sharing
policy
Hi Alicia,
One question puzzles me, studying your interventions
of AmSci)
CC : Wise, Alicia (ELS-OXF)
OBJET : [GOAL] Re: Update on statement against Elsevier's new sharing
policy
Hi Marc,
Apologies for the delay in replying - I have been on the road this week.
The introduction of tags was an idea we developed after consultation with
large, mainly
-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Couture Marc
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:03 PM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Update on statement against Elsevier's new sharing policy
Hi all,
Elsevier has a record of pretending to make
Hi all,
Elsevier has a record of pretending to make its decisions (at least partly) in
the interests of researchers, or research, and now repositories.
One example is the introduction of tagged manuscripts. I don’t really
understand how it will work and what will be gained by authors or
