[Forwarded from Jean-Claude Guédon: Direct posting had arrived encrypted.]
Le mercredi 11 mai 2011 à 23:40 -0400, Stevan Harnad a écrit :
On 2011-05-11, at 8:35 PM, jean.claude.gue...@umontreal.ca wrote:
SH:
to deposit everything as unrefereed preprints in an IR
[instead of submitting
On 2011-05-11, at 8:35 PM, jean.claude.gue...@umontreal.ca wrote:
I said nothing about peer review, and I would also agree that peer
review is indispensable. The new form of judgement that I allude to
would be a form of peer review, but probably closer to jury review than
to individual,
Le samedi 14 mai 2011 à 09:26 -0400, Stevan Harnad a écrit :
On 2011-05-11, at 8:35 PM, jean.claude.gue...@umontreal.ca wrote:
I said nothing about peer review, and I would also agree that peer
review is indispensable. The new form of judgement that I allude to
would be a form of peer
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Claude Guédon
jean.claude.gue...@umontreal.ca wrote:
I am not talking about replacing the peer review process. I am talking about
either complementing it with another system, or re-aiming the peer review
process on publishing processes that rely on the
