Peter
The RCUK policy on this is very clear - OA means CC-BY.
The existing policy will be clarified by specifically stating that Open Access
includes unrestricted use of manual and automated text and data mining tools.
Also, that it
allows unrestricted re-use of content with proper attribution
On behalf of the Wellcome Trust - one of the funders behind the UKPMC
Publishers Panel Statement of Principle - let me respond to this
posting and state that we do not believe that the re-use statement is
stating the obvious in terms of re-use.
There are many publishers who currently offer a
At the Wellcome Trust we also believe that fair use is not enough if
the benefits of text and data-mining - with its promise of discovering
new knowledge - are to be fully realised.
Consequently, as a condition of paying an open access fee, the Trust
requires publishers to licence these articles
Peter
Â
The RCUK policy on this is very clear â OA means CC-BY.
Â
âThe existing policy will be clarified by specifically stating that Open
Access
includes unrestricted use of manual and automated text and data mining tools.
Also, that it
allows unrestricted re-use of content with
[mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Peter Murray-Rust
Sent: 13 July 2012 08:57
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Chemistry and the Green Door
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Kiley, Robert
r.ki...@wellcome.ac.ukmailto:r.ki...@wellcome.ac.uk wrote
My reading of the RCUK policy is somewhat different to Stevan's. In short, I
see clear parallels between what Finch recommended (disclosure - I sat on the
Finch Working Group) and the RCUK policy.
Specifically:
· Finch recommended gold OA and flexible funding arrangements to cover
Andrew
Even if deposit locally and then harvest centrally is easy (and I would argue
that it makes far more sense to do it the other way round, not least as a
central repository like Europe PMC would have to harvest content from
potentially hundreds of repositories) the real problem is this
Laura
It is not difficult to find an example of RightLink (and probably others)
quoting re-use fees for CC-BY articles.
Let me give you an example.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898656813002489 is an
article funded by Wellcome, and made available under a CC-BY licence.
A new report published today identifies options through which funders can help
ensure that the rapidly growing open access market delivers high quality
services and value-for-money for the research community.
The report, which was commissioned by a consortium of major research funders*,
is
I don't think this quite addresses your question, but I note that PNAS charges
an $1800 publication fee. See http://www.pnas.org/site/authors/fees.xhtml .
This is not an APC (that is a separate $1350 fee), or anything to do with
colour and page charges (which are also charged separately).
Colleagues
I think I have made this point before, but what for me is astonishing about the
JCI data is that even after 13 years of making the version of record (VoR)
content, free at the time of publication, on publisher site and PMC, they had
ONLY lost 40% of subscriptions. Why were 60% of
11 matches
Mail list logo
