GOAL and JISC readers think?
There are times when the best that can be achieved is that people agree to
disagree. I think this is one of those times.
Richard Poynder
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman
of those times.
Richard Poynder
-Original Message-
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 10 May 2012 12:52
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re-posting: Meaning of Open Access
The following is a re
,
therefore, if anyone would like to share their thoughts on what policies
and strategies they feel have been effective or promising in 2011, and
how; and what they propose or foresee for2012 and why.
Richard Poynder
GOAL Moderator
www.richardpoynder.co.uk
Elsevier's Alicia Wise on the RWA, the West Wing, and Universal Access
http://bit.ly/y7Yi92
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120208/fc32c7ff/attachment.html
Michael Eisen is an evolutionary biologist at University of California
Berkeley and an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. He is
also co-founder of the Open Access (OA) publisher Public Library of Science
(PLoS).
Founded in 2000, PLoS was conceived as an advocacy group for
http://bit.ly/wYMKw2
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120227/13a91eda/attachment.html
Yesterday details of a proposed new RCUK OA policy were posted on the
Enabling Open Scholarship (EOS) web site. The EOS post reads:
The UK's Research Councils have proposed a revised policy on Open Access
which further clarifies RCUK's definition of OA and strengthens some of the
criteria that
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120502/384a85e8/attachment.html
Earlier this month a group of Open Access advocates flew to Washington to
attend a meeting with the US Office of Science Technology Policy. Their
objective was to convince OSTP that it is vital the US government ensures that
all publicly-funded research is made freely available on the Internet.
/In a recent //investment report/
http://cdn.anonfiles.com/1334923359479.pdf/, analyst //Claudio Aspesi/
http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/scholarly-publishing-where-is-plan-b.html/concluded
that a new front had opened up in the Open Access (//OA/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access/)
any suggestions to me at the email address below.
Best wishes,
Richard Poynder
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
Phone: 0793-202-4032
E-mail: ric...@dial.pipex.com
Web: www.richardpoynder.com
their article database without the
tiresome addition of bylines (and maybe also with an eye to the Tasini
ruling). This is as near transferring your rights as it gets I would think.
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
Phone: 0793-202-4032
E-mail: ric...@dial.pipex.com
Web: www.richardpoynder.com
At 11:47 12/11/2001 +, you wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Richard Poynder wrote:
as a freelance journalist I can tell you that at least
one UK national newspaper sent out a form to its freelancers last year
asking them to, amongst other things, waive their moral rights -- the aim
being I
Cyveillance, Envisonal and Marksmen.
Envisonal is monitoring over a million music tracks for IFPI I'm told.
However, as I say, I have no idea how effective this technology is, or how
effective enforcement would be, even if it were efficient at finding
infringements
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
-Universite F. Rabelais
37380 Nouzilly
France
Below is some text from the interview that didn't make it into the final
version due to length constraints. It may or may not help to clarify
things, but here it is anyway.
Richard Poynder: If an academic went to an Elsevier journal and said I
want
staff/ institutional researchers?
I'd appreciate any responses/ views/ experiences/ explanations as to why
this might or might not be a realistic scenario.
Best wishes,
Richard Poynder
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
Phone: + 44 (0)191-386-0072
Mobile: 0793-202-4032
E-mail
in areas most threatened by self-archiving?
Any thoughts/facts appreciated.
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
Phone: + 44 (0)191-386-0072
Mobile: 0793-202-4032
E-mail: richard.poyn...@journalist.co.uk
Web: www.richardpoynder.com
-Original Message-
From: September 1998 American
The Emerald piece is at http://www.infotoday.com/it/nov02/poynder.htm.
Reinventing MCB University Press, Information Today 19(8)
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
Phone: + 44 (0)191-386-0072
Mobile: 0793-202-4032
E-mail: richard.poyn...@journalist.co.uk
Web: www.richardpoynder.com
Now online at: http://www.infotoday.com/it/dec02/poynder.htm
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
Phone: + 44 (0)191-386-0072
Mobile: 0793-202-4032
E-mail: richard.poyn...@journalist.co.uk
Web: www.richardpoynder.com
This may be of interest to anyone who has not seen it:
Reed Elsevier initiated with underperform
BNP Paribas expresses its concern regarding the company's current
subscription based access, as compared to the newer and more successful
article-fee based open access system.
If you look a the site it also recommends Kluwer and Thomson as 'buys' -
it is based
as far as I can see on the (typical if I may say so) analysts opinion,
short term potential
gain.
I agree with Stevan's assessment, it is irrelevant.
Exactly. So it reminds us once again that analysts are
At 07:46 PM 10/15/2003, you wrote:
Quoting Richard Poynder richardpoyn...@verizon.net:
The reason for recommending Kluwer over RE, presumably, owes much to the
move from RE to Kluwer by Derk Haank.
Surely Haank has gone not to Kluwer (which survives as a company, shorn of
Kluwer Academic
interesting comments, but it is not clear whose words they are: does anyone
know?
Any comments can be either on or off the record as is preferred. (And I hope
Stevan doesn't slap my wrist for a posting what he may feel is off topic
here!)
Thanks.
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
www.richardpoynder.com
of change will be gradual and smooth. Maybe it will be, but
maybe it won't.
That is the potential transition problem. Who better to puzzle over it than
the UK Select Committee?
Richard Poynder
Stevan Harnad wrote:
No, dear Richard, it is OA and OA publishing that are conflated (i.e.,
treated as if they were the same thing). OA self-archiving is thereby
*overlooked* as a means of providing OA, let alone the far
faster, surer means that it in reality is, and the means that is already
put to Derk, or any general issues/topics they would like
me to raise with him. My last interview with Derk took place in 2002
(www.infotoday.com/it/apr02/poynder.htm).
Thank you.
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
www.richardpoynder.com
conducted was with Springer's Derk Haank, and
can be read at http://www.infotoday.com/it/sep04/poynder.shtml. Thanks to
those who made suggestions for that interview.
Regards,
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
www.richardpoynder.com
I shall be interviewing Stevan Harnad next month, at Internet Librarian in
London (http://www.internet-librarian.com/Monday.shtml)
If anyone would like to suggest questions they would like me to put to
Stevan please feel free to e-mail me directly.
Regards,
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
/Presentations.shtml#OA
The follow-up ILI session on Open Access in California November 17 will be at:
http://www.infotoday.com/il2004/wednesday.shtml#TrackC
Cheers,
Richard Poynder
Message-
From: Jan Velterop [mailto:velte...@biomedcentral.com]
Sent: 13 December 2004 13:56
To: 'Richard Poynder'
Subject: RE: The Green and Gold Roads to Open Access
Well, we don't shout about it too much, but Harnad sort of provoked me by
what I saw as an allegation that questioning him
List members may be interested to read an interview with the founder of
BioMed Central, Vitek Tracz, published in the January issue of Information
Today.
The interview can be accessed on the web at:
http://www.infotoday.com/it/jan05/poynder.shtml
Richard Poynder
insisting that there is no issue.
Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.com
-Original Message-
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM@LISTSERVER.SIGMAX
I.ORG] On Behalf Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 23 April 2005 20:49
To: american-scientist
that researchers retain sufficient rights to
self-archive - they can apparently achieve both aims at one fell swoop.
Richard Poynder
publishers seeking to embrace
Open Access, and/or extend the model into book publishing.
Regards,
Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk
http://poynder.blogspot.com
Dear Professor Harnad,
Dear Mr Poynder,
Mr Richard Poynder contacted us regarding the possible
Readers of this list may be interested in a profile of the OU's
institutional repository (Open Research Online) published in Computer
Weekly:
http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2008/03/10/229777/open-university-stu
dies-open-access-to-research.htm
-honan.html
Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk
be grateful for details of what the estimated costs were, and
links to any papers/reports that were produced as a result of that research
(if they are available on an OA basis).
Thanks in advance.
Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk
,
Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk
.
Thank you in anticipation.
Richard Poynder
Freelance Journalist
www.richardpoynder.co.uk
PS: I should stress that Niaz Ahmed appears to have no connection
whatsoever with Dr Niyaz Ahmed (http://www.isogem.org/niyaz.html), an
Indian-based OA advocate, and section editor for PLoS
List members may be interested in reading a profile of OA advocate Eberhard
Hilf, which includes a discussion of the current status of OA in Germany:
http://poynder.blogspot.com/2009/10/open-access-profile-of-eberhard-hilf.htm
l
Regards,
Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk
An interview with Lars Fischer, the person who drafted the German
petition, can be read here:
http://poynder.blogspot.com/2009/11/german-petition-takes-open-access.html
Richard Poynder
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo
.
Richard Poynder
-Original Message-
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On
Behalf Of Arif Jinha
Sent: 06 January 2010 06:44
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: Growth rate
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On
Behalf Of Klaus Graf
Sent: 20 January 2010 10:10
To: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: Gratis OA and LIbre OA
2010/1/20 Stevan Harnad
that is apparently becoming common
in China (http://tiny.cc/5a58S).
Richard Poynder
-Original Message-
From: American Scientist Open Access Forum
[mailto:american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org] On
Behalf Of Guédon Jean-Claude
Sent: 17 February 2010 06:25
To: american-scientist-open
I am told that my last message using Tiny URL is likely to have been rejected by
spam filters, so I am sending through the full URL:
http://poynder.blogspot.com/2010/02/open-access-linked-to-alabama-shooting.html
Â
Apologies to all.
Â
Richard Poynder
Â
There will soon be a big new beast in the IP jungle. And while the creature
comes with the seemingly innocuous acronym of ACTA, cyber activists and
copyright mavens fear that it will pave the way for a Global DMCA (Digital
Millennium Copyright Act) that will significantly impact on ordinary
Should institutional repositories be viewed as preservation tools?
Â
Should self-archiving mandates always be accompanied by a âpreservation
mandateâ?
Â
Should Gold OA funds be used to enable preservation in institutional
repositories?
Â
More, including an interview with digital
What is Open Notebook Science (ONS)?
How does it differ from Open Access (OA)?
What does ONS mean for researchers?
What does ONS mean for publishers?
What does ONS mean for librarians?
What role do institutional repositories have to play in ONS?
Drexel University's Jean Claude-Bradley explains
The interview I published on Open Shut? in 2006 with BioMed Central
founder Vitek Tracz has been re-published in the journal Logos.
Since the OA environment has changed somewhat since 2006 - not least as a
result of the sale of BMC to Springer in 2008 - the interview includes an
update. In that
An interview with Derk Haank, CEO of Springer Science+Business Media has
been published in the January issue of Information Today.
More here:
http://poynder.blogspot.com/2011/01/interview-with-springers-derk-haank.html
In May 2007 the University of Liège created an institutional repository called
ORBi (the Open Repository and Bibliography).
Â
The following year the University introduced a self-archiving mandate that
requires faculty members to deposit copies of all their research papers in the
repository.Â
âLeader of a Leaderless Revolutionâ
http://poynder.blogspot.com/2011/07/peter-suber-leader-of-leaderless.html
Â
Â
How much will Gold OA eventually cost? And how will the research community pay
for it?
Â
http://bit.ly/nJOxNL
Â
This is a nettle that OA organisations like SPARC, OASPA and COPE should be
grasping.
There are things they could be doing, and things they could be saying. And for
so long as
the OA movement continues to ignore the problem, Open Access is in danger of
being discredited.
People are beginning to
AmSci subscribers over to the new list. Stevan has kindly
agreed to oversee the migration before handing the list over.
Â
Please bear with us while this work is undertaken.
Â
Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk
Â
In an article published in The Charleston Review in July 2010, Jeffrey Beall, a
librarian at the University of Colorado, Denver, described OMICS Publishing
Group as a predatory Open Access publisher. âHaving a large number of titles,
as
does the OMICS Publishing Group, is typical of predatory
wonder,
therefore, if anyone would like to share their thoughts on what policies
and strategies they feel have been effective or promising in 2011, and
how; and what they propose or foresee for2012 and why.
Richard Poynder
GOAL Moderator
www.richardpoynder.co.uk
were absent, which was clearly
confusing to readers.
Â
The good news is that a properly formatted version of the response is now
available on the Harvard web site here:
Â
http://osc.hul.harvard.edu/2012/01/harvard-responds-white-house-rfi-open-access
Â
Richard Poynder
GOAL Moderator
Â
Â
Of possible interest to list members.Â
For immediate release.
De Gruyter acquires Versita and becomes third-biggest international Open
Access publisher
Berlin, January 9, 2012
De Gruyter, the Berlin-based academic publishing company, is acquiring the
publisher Versita. As a service
http://bit.ly/yVRnu9
[ Part 2: Attached Text ]
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
http://bit.ly/x9UzXE
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
http://bit.ly/zUfpKB
Â
Â
Â
[ Part 2: Attached Text ]
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from t.co claiming to be
http://ow.ly/1DSVLo
[ Part 2: Attached Text ]
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
A number of organisations and publishers have released statements about
the Research Works Act in the past few days:
The University of California Press differs from AAP on the Research
Works Act: http://bit.ly/yM5w13
Nature Publishing Group, Digital Science and the do not support the
Like members of all movements, OA advocates come in all shapes and
sizes, and they are driven by a variety of different motives. Some have
embraced OA, for instance, because they see it as a good business
opportunity, some because they want their research to be more
accessible, and so have
Currently CEO of Academic Concept Knowledge Limited (AQnowledge), Jan Velterop
has in his time worked for Elsevier, Academic Press, Springer, Nature and BioMed
Central. He was one of the architects of the controversial Big Deal, and one of
the small group of people who attended the 2001 meeting
Yesterday details of a proposed new RCUK OA policy were posted on the Enabling
Open Scholarship (EOS) web site. The EOS post reads:
Â
The UK's Research Councils have proposed a revised policy on Open Access which
further clarifies RCUK's definition of OA and strengthens some of the criteria
Last month Elsevier withdrew its support for the controversial Research Works
Act. Had it become law, the RWA would have rolled back the NIH Public Access
Policy requiring that funded researchers make their papers freely available on
the Web within 12 months of publication. It would also have
Original Message
Subject:
Open access to Dutch research stagnating
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date:
Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:42:31 +0200
From:
Kuil, van der Annemiek vanderk...@surf.nl
Reply-To:
Kuil, van der Annemiek vanderk...@surf.nl
To:
When Jim Yong Kim takes office as the new president of the World Bank on 1st
July, he will be the first development professional to head the Bank. That is
new. But it is not all that is new at the World Bank. The new president will
inherit an organisation that has undergone a lot of navel gazing
The [UK] government has drafted in the Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales to help
make all taxpayer-funded academic research in Britain available online to anyone
who wants to read or use it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/may/01/wikipedia-research-jimmy-wales
-online
[ Part 2:
provide will prove fit for
purpose.
Richard Poynder
On 08/05/2012 11:50, Stevan Harnad wrote:
For the perplexed reader:
1. Peter Murray-Rust is a dedicated advocate for certain text-mining and
re-use rights that are very important and very fruitful in certain fields
of research (but not all
Just a quick reminder to the list that the best way of having a productive
discussion is for those taking part to bear in mind the phrase: âPlay the
ball,
not the manâ.
Â
Richard Poynder
GOAL Moderator
Â
Â
Â
[ Part 2: Attached Text
GOAL and JISC readers think?
There are times when the best that can be achieved is that people agree to
disagree. I think this is one of those times.
Richard Poynder
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman
to share their thoughts
with us too? Surely it is time for the research community to enter into a public
dialogue with publishers? Who knows what benefits might follow?
Â
Richard Poynder
GOAL Moderator
[ Part 2: Attached Text ]
___
GOAL mailing
Dear All,
I fear a personal message may have been mistakenly posted to the mailing
list. Apologies to all concerned.
Richard Poynder
GOAL Moderator
On 12/05/2012 13:22, Rzepa Henry wrote:
Peter,
As a seasoned traveller, you probably have your favourite guest house in
Philadelphia! ACS
On 1st June, the Association of Learned and Professional Society
Publishers (ALPSP), along with the Publishers Association (PA),
distributed a press release advertising the results of a survey that had
recently been commissioned.
The objective of the survey had been to estimate the likely
Jeffrey Beall, a metadata librarian at the University of Colorado Denver,
maintains a list of what he calls predatory publishers. That is,
publishers who, as Beall puts it, unprofessionally exploit the gold
open-access model for their own profit. Amongst other things, this can mean
that papers are
Martin Hall was a member of the committee that published the controversial
Finch Report on OA in the UK.
Some excerpts:
*** On green OA:
[I]t's important to recognize that there are a number of varieties of green
OA . green means different things to different people; for some, it's an
Dear All,
I fear I let through a spam message by mistake.
Many apologies, I have been on the move today and was trying to keep the
flow going using, variously, an iPad and my cell phone. I will do my best
not to let it happen again.
Richard Poynder
GOAL Moderator
Is there an umbrella organisation that represents independent
community-based journals like these? If not, should there be such an
organisation?
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Laurent Romary
Sent: 09 August 2012 10:44
To: Bo-Christer Björk
Cc:
I was thinking that some people may feel the needs and aspirations of small
community-based journals would be somewhat different to the needs and
aspirations of those large commercial publishers that have joined OASPA.
-Original Message-
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org
important to document and support fee-free journals.
Best wishes,
Richard Poynder
-Original Message-
From: open-access-boun...@lists.okfn.org
[mailto:open-access-boun...@lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gray
Sent: 15 August 2012 15:37
To: open-acc...@lists.okfn.org
Subject: [Open-access
.
Perhaps someone from Springer could provide further pricing information for
members of the GOAL mailing list? If there is no published price list,
perhaps a few examples could be given, or a pricing formula?
Richard Poynder
PRESS RELEASE
Springer now publishing Open Access books
Although the history of the Open Access movement can be traced back to at
least 1994 (or even earlier), its birth is widely held to have taken place
at the 2001 Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI). Certainly, it was at
this point that the term open access was first used.
The BOAI emerged from
Founded in 1997, Hindawi Publishing Corporation was the first subscription
publisher to convert its entire portfolio of journals to Open Access (OA).
This has enabled the company to grow very rapidly and today it publishes
over 400 OA journals.
The speed of Hindawi's growth, which included
Love it or loathe it, the recently announced Open Access policy from
Research Councils UK has certainly divided the OA movement. Despite
considerable criticism, however, RCUK has refused to amend its policy.
So what will be its long-term impact?
Critics fear that RCUK has opened the door
On 28 Oct 2012, at 23:07, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Giving up authors' preferred journals in favour of pure Gold OA journals was
what (I think) BMC's Vitek Tracz and Jan Velterop had been lobbying for at
the time
Stevan may think so, but that doesn't make it correct or accurate. What we
-archiving is impractical. That said, for those who want it BioMed
Central supports self-archiving by offering to help institutions create
repositories for their researchers' papers.
Richard Poynder
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Jan Velterop
repositories that use the service (0.9% of the market), whereas ROAR lists
18 (0.6%).
BMC itself lists 22 organisations that use its Open Repository services
(http://www.openrepository.com/customers).
Richard Poynder
-Original Message-
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun
An interview with Kent Anderson, Editor-in Chief of the Scholarly Kitchen,
CEO/Publisher of The Journal of Bone Joint Surgery, President-Elect of the
Society for Scholarly Publishing, and one of the more vocal sceptics of
open access.
Amongst other things, Anderson explains why he believes
Stuart Shieber is the Welch Professor of Computer Science at Harvard
University, http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/sshieber Faculty
Co-Director of the http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/sshieber Berkman
Center for Internet and Society, Director of Harvard's Office for Scholarly
Communication
it is helpful to ensure that we do not
equate Gold with APCs.
David
On 3 Dec 2012, at 18:51, Richard Poynder wrote:
Stuart Shieber is the Welch Professor of Computer Science at Harvard
University, http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/sshieber Faculty
Co-Director of the http
appears to have used for its sample quite a few publishers that are included
on Jeffrey Bealls list of predatory publishers.
Richard Poynder
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Hans Pfeiffenberger
Sent: 12 December 2012 23:15
To: Global Open Access
Mounce
Sent: 13 December 2012 09:59
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Interview with Harvard's Stuart Shieber
On 13 December 2012 09:32, Richard Poynder ri...@richardpoynder.co.uk
mailto:ri...@richardpoynder.co.uk wrote:
I believe this latter study included
Point taken, but was there a particular reason for including the Beall
journals in your study? What purpose did it serve?
The criticism of some of these journals, by the way, goes some way beyond
the fact that they are guilty of spamming researchers.
Richard Poynder
-Original Message
is in danger of eroding due to the
increasing influence of predatory publishing.
(http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/2012-December/001353.html).
Richard Poynder
-Original Message-
From: Bo-Christer Björk [mailto:bo-christer.bj...@hanken.fi]
Sent: 13 December 2012 12:17
To: Richard
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dan Scott dan.sc...@socialsciencesdirectory.com
Date: 11 December 2012 11:45:49 GMT
To: sparc-oafo...@arl.org
Subject: [sparc-oaforum] RUSSELL GROUP UNIVERSITY REACHES INSTITUTIONAL
MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHER SOCIAL SCIENCES DIRECTORY
] Re: Interview with Harvard's Stuart Shieber
Am 13.12.12 14:09, schrieb Richard Poynder:
Another way would be for DOAJ to start excluding journals but that
could become very complicated and resource demanding.
This is no doubt true, but isn't it time that some organisation took
-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Richard Poynder
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:00 PM
To: 'Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)'
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Interview with Harvard's Stuart Shieber
Thanks for this Alicia. Can you put some numbers
1 - 100 of 306 matches
Mail list logo