--- Santosh Helekar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would you say is the scientific accuracy of
anything in the Bible? I am asking you because you
seem to question the accuracy of scientific methods
like radiocarbon dating. Would 195,000 years be
outside the margin of accuracy of Biblical
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Here are links to three articles discussing quite
convincingly a creationist view point.
Orlando,
There is a lot of self-published pseudoscientific
literature on creationism on the web and in print. It
appears convincing only to believers, lay people or
- Original Message -
From: Peter D'Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: goanet@goanet.org
Sent: 28 February, 2005 6:41 PM
Subject: [Goanet] Evolution (contd)
Elsewhere in this post I have
explained the seeming consistency in an evolutionist's belief that man
might
have existed for millions
Hi Peter,
Your latest post under the above thread did appear on
Goanet (Please see the archives). Therefore, I am
posting this reply. Here are my responses to your
points.
Peter D'Souza wrote:
You are incorrect in stating that he assumed a
constant_ growth rate. In fact, this is what he did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Santosh Helekar said:
SH I have to say that your understanding of the article
SH is completely off. What you state above refers only to
SH the first couple of paragraphs of that article with
SH quite revealing title of Evolution and the Population
SH
