From: Aires Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aires 1: As late as around 10.30 p.m and that too in the sacred parochial house fiddling with the pendant is totally out of place.
JC 1: Make up your mind Advocate Aires Rodrigues. What time did this alleged incident occur 10:30pm or after 11:15pm?
Please vide your letter to the Archbishop - " On 24th December last year around 11.15 p.m. the daughter of one of my neighbour, 13 year old (name omitted) was called to the Church under the guise of church activity"
===
Aires 2: if anyone wants a copy of her complaint to the police please let me know. I will try and post a copy of it on goanet for the benefit of all.
JC 2: Quite frankly, Advocate Aires Rodrigues, no point in having someone say something without the chance to be crossed. If Auda Viegas is unable to post the complaint herself, and make herself available for questions as to HOW she came about to collect the info and file that complaint - please don't bother with posting that complaint.
===
Aires 3: I have nothing personal against the accused (priest)
JC 3: Trust me, Advocate Aires Rodrigues ... I believe you (;-) Yeah Right! Sure ! But Of course! Hey...it is clear as crystal.
===
Aires 4: The uncle has violated no one's privacy. May be the priest's!. It is a coincidence that the uncle has many nieces of the same age
JC 4: With due respect, dear Sir, please allow someone else to believe that both You and the Uncle have NOT violated the 13 year old's privacy rights by releasing the name of the Uncle.
Whatever the merits or demerits of this case, You dear Sir, having qualified as a lawyer, should have known better than that.
If I (sitting several thousand miles west of Ribandar) can identify the 13 year old from the name of the Uncle....just imagine! If you wish to continue to defend a defenceless position ( wrt the violation of this 13 year old's privacy)...Good Luck. Feel absolutely free to fool yourself.
You have added a financial dimension (Church finances) in today's response. I only have interests in the alleged child molestation case.
I strongly object to the mixing of issues esp in child abuse cases - unless they are intrinsically related.
I will repeat that I strongly condemn anyone who violates children either by : Molesting them, Making it easy for others to identify them, or Using them as Pawns in games people conjure up.
It is these pawn-games and foul-ups that eventually cause the loss of genuine cases of serious Child Abuse.
Nada Mais.
jose
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
