------------------------------------------------------------------------
* G * O * A * N * E * T **** C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enjoy your holiday in Goa. Stay at THE GARCA BRANCA from November to May
         There is no better, value for money, guest house.
              Confirm your bookings early or miss-out

  Visit http://www.garcabranca.com for details/booking/confirmation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Empowering rural women... the self-help group way. Really?

---------------------------------------------------
Empowering Rural Women in Goa:
An appraisal of Self-Help Groups under SGSY
Arlette M H Mascarenhas
Goa Institute of Rural Development & Administration
Ela, Old Goa
No date mentioned. 96pp.
---------------------------------------------------

It's one of those schemes with an unpronounceable, almost
unrememberable names, probably crafted by bureaucrats with a
one-size-fits-all approach in New Delhi. So who's to blame
for not recognising sufficiently the Swarnajayanti Gram
Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY Scheme)?

Do we fail to appreciate its potential? Have we just become
cynical of all government? Have we no empathy left for rural
concerns? Or is this all just official spin?

Mascarenhas introduces the SGSY as one of the "micro-credit
programmes for women (that are being) increasingly lauded by
development agencies as an effective intervention with a
positive impact on economic growth and improvement of the
social status of women". This is not necessarily true in Goa,
but in other parts of the 'developing' world and India.

So how is this being played out in Goa? Does it go beyond the
traditional pickles-and-papads model? Does it impart new
skills?

          This study looks at Ponda and Quepem talukas. It
          focuses on all-women self-help groups. Ponda is
          described as the "land of temples, singing, drama
          and folk-art". Becoming a tourism spot, with many
          engaged in tourism-related activited and
          agriculture, it's very different from hilly Quepem
          with its villages scattered. Quepem's people depend
          on agriculture and farming.

Mascarenhas says Goa has 426 self-help groups under the SGSY.
With names like Nagesh SHG, Betora SHG or Kamakshi SHG,
Navdurga SHG, Mahalsa SHG, and Sateri SHG, these tiny
insitutions are bringing about a change in the way women
perceive themselves, and their abilities.

Or, are they?

So what do they do? Mascarenhas writes: "Their activities
include vegetable, flower and coconut selling, taking
catering orders at weddings and feasts; and selling flowers,
making and selling masala powder, pickles, sweets, papads,
shell items, etc".

Ponda's many temples, notes the author, creates "good
business" for selling flowers and coconut. But then,
shouldn't value-added speedy skill upgradation be a priority
with Goa's rural womenfolk? Can we just manage with a 'more
of the same' approach?

In Quepem, meanwhile, self-help groups now have an income
"from Rs 3000 to even Rs 6000 and even around Rs 8,000 at
times". This sum may seem like a pittance, when converted
into dollar-equivalents. But consider the fact that many
parts of Goa simply don't have access to the monetised
economy. And that, till a generation ago, most people lived
without money in any case. On the other hand, we can't get
smug with a this-is-fine approach!

Activities are mostly agricultural like cashew, fruit and
coconut selling, dairy farming, with a few taking up to
sweet-making and candle-making.

Amidst a whole lot of detail -- such as what motivated women
to join, family incomes before and after joining the
self-help groups, attitudes within the groups, group
functioning and more -- there is also an attempt to sketch
the broad picture.

Some conclusions:

* Such groups can do "much better" in Goa.
* Mere financial assistance does not help the women.
* Many women do not possess prior experience in production.
* They need institutional support.
* Training, skill upgradation, marketing strategies is their need.
* Information on the latest available technology is also key.
* Such schemes are meant mainly for BPL (below the poverty line)
sections; but others too manipulate and squeeze in.
* Officials need to focus on quality groups, rather than
"just forming groups for quality sake".
* Officials need training in rural communication, and
patience with the rural poor.
* Before introducing credit programmes, officials need to
offer brainstorming sessions on the principles of
micro-credit.
* Group members need to act as managers and watchdogs,
ensuring discipline on themselves and reducing dependency on
"outsiders".
* Villagers need training in marketing techniques.

Mascarenhas' report suggests that such groups venture into
other activities -- fruit, fish and meat processing or
canning; tailoring, flower and candle-making; organic
farming; setting up nurseries and floriculture; mushroom
cultivation; moving into other varieties of food; working in
handicrafts....

All in all, an interesting report, with some honest and
critical pointers at where things need to be improved. While
there could be scope for other perspectives on this issue,
for sure it throws light on a topic that few are otherwise
concerned with.
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frederick Noronha http://fn.goa-india.org  9822122436 +91-832-240-9490
http://fredericknoronha.wordpress.com http://www.flickr.com/photos/fn-goa/
_______________________________________________
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org

Reply via email to