Those who were loyal to Portugal and the Portuguese government claimed that
rapes were being committed by Indians even before the invasion of 1961 -
indeed, as early as 1958, according to one loyalist writer. On the other hand,
apologists for the actions of the Indian government and
.
Cheers,
Gabriel.
From: Santosh Helekar chimbel...@yahoo.com
To: Goa's premiere mailing list, estb. 1994! goanet@lists.goanet.org
Sent: Sunday, 6 January 2013 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Goanet] GOA LIBERATION RETROSPECT Adv. Antonio Lobo
Helekar chimbel...@yahoo.com; Goa's premiere mailing list, estb.
1994! goanet@lists.goanet.org
Sent: Sun, Jan 6, 2013 7:19 pm
Subject: [Goanet] GOA LIBERATION RETROSPECT Adv. Antonio Lobo
On Sunday, 6 January 2013, Santosh Helekar wrote:
Those who were loyal to Portugal and the Portuguese
Gabriel wrote:
So what is your point Santosh?
Gabriel,
The answer to this question should have been obvious to you since you yourself
have confirmed my point in what you have written below. My point is that
loyalists and apologists on either side have written about the atrocities
committed
It was heartening to read the exposition on the unbecoming travails imposed on
some prominent GOANS by the PROCONSUL sent to GOA after Operation VIJAY, who
behaved even more arrogantly than the Roman Cesars. It was specially
encouraging that the courageous expose was not censored.
Adv. Antonio
heroes.
With my very best personal regards,
Victor Rangel-Ribeiro
--- On Sat, 1/5/13, Jean Marcos Catao cata...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Jean Marcos Catao cata...@yahoo.com
Subject: [Goanet] GOA LIBERATION RETROSPECT Adv. Antonio Lobo
To: goanet@lists.goanet.org goanet
Dear Marcos,
What you have written is totally implausible.
1: there was NO invasion; the Purtuguez soldados just abandoned Goa and left.
2: those liquor cases you saw were kept at the Mandovi for safe-keeping; the
Purtuguez would otherwise have swiped them and taken them (along with the gold)
