Re: [Goanet] Why not 'Cheers!"

2014-02-12 Thread Venantius J Pinto
; > Original message > From: Cecil Pinto > Date: 11-02-2014 2:53 AM (GMT-05:00) > To: goanet ,Venantius J Pinto > Subject: [Goanet] Why not 'Cheers!" > > Venantius J Pinto wrote: > Hopefully Floriano's response gets published in

Re: [Goanet] Why not 'Cheers!"

2014-02-12 Thread Venantius J Pinto
rom: Cecil Pinto >> Date: 11-02-2014 2:53 AM (GMT-05:00) >> To: goanet ,Venantius J Pinto >> >> Subject: [Goanet] Why not 'Cheers!" >> >> Venantius J Pinto wrote: >> Hopefully Floriano's response gets published in the Press/Letters. >>

Re: [Goanet] Why not 'Cheers!"

2014-02-11 Thread roland.francis
Pinto Subject: [Goanet] Why not 'Cheers!" Venantius J Pinto wrote: Hopefully Floriano's response gets published in the Press/Letters. Also a suggestion: skip signing off with Cheers. -- Dear Venantius, Please expand on your suggestion. What is wrong with signing off

Re: [Goanet] Why not 'Cheers!"

2014-02-11 Thread Venantius J Pinto
The sentiment Cheers suggests a certain cordiality and supposedly thanks, although I have always suspected that as unintended. MY OPINION: When one is presenting heavy material, charged material, which has strategy, analysis -- in my personal opinion use an innocuous (harmless) sign off. I There a

[Goanet] Why not 'Cheers!"

2014-02-11 Thread Cecil Pinto
Venantius J Pinto wrote: Hopefully Floriano's response gets published in the Press/Letters. Also a suggestion: skip signing off with Cheers. -- Dear Venantius, Please expand on your suggestion. What is wrong with signing off with Cheers? Cheers! Cecil =