On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:51:52 -0200
"Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Log message:
> > > Inclusion of $goboVariable/lock, as some builds expects it (eg:
^^
> > > Minicom)
> > >
> > > ...
> > > mkdir -p $rootdir/
On 12/18/06, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:25:35 +
> "Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Log message:
> > Inclusion of $goboVariable/lock, as some builds expects it (eg:
> > Minicom)
> >
> > ...
> > mkdir -p $rootdir/Sy
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:25:35 +
"Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Log message:
> Inclusion of $goboVariable/lock, as some builds expects it (eg:
> Minicom)
>
> ...
> mkdir -p $rootdir/System/Variable
> mkdir -p $rootdir/System/Variable/tmp
> mkdir -p $rootdir
A problem I have with USE flags in Portage is that, sometimes, a lot of
unneeded stuff is installed when I install a given ebuild, just because one
of its dependencies has some unneeded USE flag on.
Searching in Google, I found some Gentoo users saying they wonder if Portage
could make the instal
On 12/18/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/12/17, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I don't know if this has been discussed before, but is there a reason
> > for us to use 'svn' as version on SVN recipes, while we use `date
> > +%Y%m%d`"-CVS" for CVS
2006/12/17, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi there,
>
> I don't know if this has been discussed before, but is there a reason
> for us to use 'svn' as version on SVN recipes, while we use `date
> +%Y%m%d`"-CVS" for CVS ones?
>
I think it was just overlooked. Changing it now. :)
--
/J
