On 2/22/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The DHCPNetworkInterface task has a fairly serious bug. It deletes
> the /dev/null node if there's a dhcpcd.pid file. The rm on line 23 is
> missing the > redirector.
>
> Attached is my task with a few additions. 1) Sources BootOptions and
>
The DHCPNetworkInterface task has a fairly serious bug. It deletes
the /dev/null node if there's a dhcpcd.pid file. The rm on line 23 is
missing the > redirector.
Attached is my task with a few additions. 1) Sources BootOptions and
NetworkOptions 2) adds -h "$HostName" to dhcpcd cmdline.
#1
On 2/22/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/22/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What happens when you don't have /dev/console listed for kern.*? Does
> > it still log something to the console (I think so, but I'd just like
> > to be sure of that).
> >
>
> I'
On 2/22/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that we should ship a default syslog.conf, that's almost required imo.
> I'm not sure about if logrotate is required, but it would be a great addition.
> Regarding cron I've wanted one for a long time and we have had talks
> about it,
On 2/22/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What happens when you don't have /dev/console listed for kern.*? Does
> it still log something to the console (I think so, but I'd just like
> to be sure of that).
>
I'm testing multiple entries for kern.* Anyone know how to trigger
o
On 2/22/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/2/22, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 2/22/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmm.. on my new 013 system there is no /S/V/log/messages, but syslogd
> > > and klogd is running...
> > > But, now I see that
On 2/22/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh yeah, forgot to submit that bug. Attached is my syslog.conf.
> Should we ship a default? If so, we should also have a rotatelogs and
> cron.
I'd be interested in having a sensible default shipped with the
recipe/package. If nothing else, i
2007/2/22, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2/22/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm.. on my new 013 system there is no /S/V/log/messages, but syslogd
> > and klogd is running...
> > But, now I see that /Programs/Sysklogd/Settings does not exist!
> >
>
> Oh yeah, forg
On 2/22/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm.. on my new 013 system there is no /S/V/log/messages, but syslogd
and klogd is running...
But, now I see that /Programs/Sysklogd/Settings does not exist!
Oh yeah, forgot to submit that bug. Attached is my syslog.conf.
Should we shi
On 2/22/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has been hitting me in the head for a few hours tonight.
> Basically, SymlinkProgram only calls FixLibtoolLa for lib/*.la. This
> ignores *.la in subdirs of lib. Pseudo patch:
>
> (around line 227)
> -FixLibtoolLa *.la
> +
Carlo Calica wrote:
> On 2/18/07, Andy Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As Lucas said, the rule might have a syntax error. I found the syntax
>> has changed since the first time I used Udev on Gobo, so even copying
>> a rule that used to work is not guaranteed. Try running udevtest on
>> /dev/
El Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:55:16 -0300
"Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribi__:
> Could you please provide an example on how you're planning to do that?
> I didn't understand exacly how the script is going to create the
> Makefile, as it's highly dependent on how the build scripts are
> wr
On 2/18/07, Andy Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Lucas said, the rule might have a syntax error. I found the syntax
> has changed since the first time I used Udev on Gobo, so even copying
> a rule that used to work is not guaranteed. Try running udevtest on
> /dev/fuse: it should try to par
This has been hitting me in the head for a few hours tonight.
Basically, SymlinkProgram only calls FixLibtoolLa for lib/*.la. This
ignores *.la in subdirs of lib. Pseudo patch:
(around line 227)
-FixLibtoolLa *.la
+find . -name '*.la' |xargs FixLibtoolLa
PS. You still
On 2/21/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/18/07, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd suggest to mark the package as such also (installed from unchecked
> > Recipe). If the signature check failed, either the Recipe is broken/needs
> > update or a bug
15 matches
Mail list logo
