On 2/23/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/2/23, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts
> > Module name:tools
> > Changes by: Lucas C. Villa Real07/02/23 03:07:36
> >
> > Modified files:
> > DevelScripts/bin: PutRecipe
On 3/27/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:12:57 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On 3/27/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:42:36 +0200, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > We already have ESP-
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:12:57 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 3/27/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:42:36 +0200, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > We already have ESP-GhostScript, so I think we should use GhostScript
>> > (GNU-Gho
On 3/27/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:42:36 +0200, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We already have ESP-GhostScript, so I think we should use GhostScript
> > (GNU-Ghostscript was already using that) and artofcode-Ghostscript
> > with a possible AFPL-Gho
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:42:36 +0200, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jonas Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, since GNU Ghostscript call themself GNU-Ghostscript, would it be
>> wrong to name that recipe to just GNU-Ghostscript and keep Ghostscript
>> as
>> the name for the artofc
On 3/27/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like an option to include a url to NewVersion. Similar to the
> explicit usage of MakeRecipe. I normally have the url handy anyways
> because I'm checking upstream for a new version. I've been bitten by
> a .gz to .bz2 change too. That
On 3/27/07, Andy Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lucas: Should people add their own -rX revision numbers to submitted
> recipes before sending them in, or just let you coordinate that?
There's no need to hand-write a revision number. The scripts used to
upload a recipe automatically checks wh
Here's the steps I would take:
1. Download the recipe with 'GetRecipe [ProgramName]', which will
unpack it in /Files/Compiles/Recipes.
2. Create the file /F/C/R/[ProgramName]/[Ver]/Resources/Description by
using another recipe as an example, and enter whatever description you
like.
3. Move the Rec
"Jonas Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, since GNU Ghostscript call themself GNU-Ghostscript, would it be
> wrong to name that recipe to just GNU-Ghostscript and keep Ghostscript as
> the name for the artofcode GPL-version? Or should they be named
> GNU-Ghostscript and GPL-Ghostscr
