Re: [gobolinux-devel] What is the preferred location for Lua's modules?

On 5/5/07, mpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on recipes for Lua and several of Lua's modules. > > There are two types of Lua modules: > * modules written in Lua > * modules written in C > > My question is, should modules be installed in the Lua-default locatons: > > $target/share

[gobolinux-devel] What is the preferred location for Lua's modules?

Hi, I'm working on recipes for Lua and several of Lua's modules. There are two types of Lua modules: * modules written in Lua * modules written in C My question is, should modules be installed in the Lua-default locatons: $target/share/lua/5.1(for Lua modules) $target/lib/lua/5.1(for C

Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE flags & Xorg

On 5/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To save stretching that out even further, I agree with everything Hisham just said. The gvim/gmplayer case was exactly what I was thinking of. Gentoo often has flags that aren't hugely useful in the general case (like "mysql" vs "mysqli" f

Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE flags & Xorg

Wow, that was a huge email to reply, lot's of stuff going on, but I gave my best. Here it goes: On 5/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:40:48 +0200, Michael Homer > > On 5/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:42:14 +0200,

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Bootstrap patchs

On 5/5/07, Aitor Pérez Iturri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What does 'uname -m' return on Epia? Bootstrap checks for the variable > > $cross_uname_m, already defined in the Cross-Files. I'd prefer to keep > > using that variable and just modify InvokeCompile instead, so that the > > Cross files d

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Bootstrap patchs

El Sat, 5 May 2007 17:59:43 -0300 "Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió > That's fine. I just removed the extra 'a' in the end, as it looks like > it was a typo. > Just a note: you don't need to put extra comments around the lines > added by you. Credits are already going into the CVS

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Bootstrap patchs

On 5/5/07, Aitor Pérez Iturri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everybody. > > Here comes some patches i made for BootStrap and related Scripts: > > For ChrootCompile: > 1. Patch: ChrootCompile.1.diff > Patch against: /ChrootCompile/1.57/Thu Mar 29 07:50:56 2007// > * Added a "makedi

Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE flags & Xorg

On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:40:48 +0200, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, 04 May 2007 21:42:14 +0200, Hisham Muhammad >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 5/3/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 5/4/07, [EM

Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE flags & Xorg

On 5/4/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 04 May 2007, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/3/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Dependency files are still a complication though, unless they're > >> changed into a shell-sourceable format. Ideally i

[gobolinux-devel] Bootstrap patchs

Hi everybody. Here comes some patches i made for BootStrap and related Scripts: For ChrootCompile: 1. Patch: ChrootCompile.1.diff Patch against: /ChrootCompile/1.57/Thu Mar 29 07:50:56 2007// * Added a "makedir -p " command to create_root function Needed to ensure that wo

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Dependencies (was: USE flags & Xorg)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonas Karlsson wrote: >>> Dependency files are still a complication though, unless they're >>> changed into a shell-sourceable format. Ideally it would be compatible >>> with existing files though, so I guess that means using a comment. "# >>> :gtk" fo