On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michael Homer wrote:
> > > It would be silly to write that, since the flag definitely won't be
> > > enabled by default. -gtk1 won't do anything
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:26 AM, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:03 PM, jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 12 April 2008 20:06:10 Michael Homer wrote:
> > > > The environm
Hisham wrote:
> If they're not "real" in the sense that they are not Gentoo-equivalent
> use flags, then yes, they're not. But if they're not use flags, then
> what are they? I find it better to keep the name than to just invent a
> name and have to explain it to people like "well, they're basicall
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Homer wrote:
> > It would be silly to write that, since the flag definitely won't be
> > enabled by default. -gtk1 won't do anything unless you've already
> > enabled it yourself earlier in the file.
> > -Mich
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:03 PM, jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 April 2008 20:06:10 Michael Homer wrote:
> > > The environment variable takes a space-separated list of flag
> > > specifications (rath
Daniele Maccari wrote:
Hi all,
attached you'll find the patch for the commented OptionParser script.
I fixed some little things we discussed with Jonas and Michael (thanks
to both for the help, and their patience). I hope this to be
"definitive", mainly because this way we'll have a default s
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:03 PM, jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 12 April 2008 20:06:10 Michael Homer wrote:
> > The environment variable takes a space-separated list of flag
> > specifications (rather than newline), so it accepts a special syntax
> > for the specifications, with ';
Daniele Maccari wrote:
> Omg, again, please note that in this part:
>
> [ $3 -lt 0 -a $(( $i+$3+1 )) -lt ${#tokens} ] && echo -n ${tokens[$(( $i+$3+1
> ))]}
>
> of the Get_Token function, the control about $(( $i+$3+1 )) is still wrong,
> it should be greater than -1, if I'm not wrong on this too
Omg, again, please note that in this part:
[ $3 -lt 0 -a $(( $i+$3+1 )) -lt ${#tokens} ] && echo -n ${tokens[$(( $i+$3+1
))]}
of the Get_Token function, the control about $(( $i+$3+1 )) is still wrong, it
should be greater than -1, if I'm not wrong on this too :D
Thanks for your patience.
___
Following Kevin's suggestions, I created another patch, which you can
find attached ;)
Bye
--- trunk/Scripts/Functions/String 2008-04-13 19:15:44.0 +0200
+++ trunk.new/Scripts/Functions/String 2008-04-14 09:13:22.0 +0200
@@ -1,73 +1,215 @@
#!/bin/bash (source)
-# ///
10 matches
Mail list logo
