You can't pre/pos-fix the unpacked source with the username?

Example:

albumart-1.6.2-fmierlo

or better/worst:

fmierlo/albumart-1.6.2

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:45:27 +0200, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >> On 17/04/2008, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  > On 17/04/2008, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  >  > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Jonas Karlsson
>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >  > > Hello,
>  >>  >  >  >
>  >>  >  >  >  New major features
>  >>  >  >  >  Scripts:
>  >>  >  >  >  * "unsudoing"
>  >>
>  >> >  >
>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >  > There are a number of sudo changes in this release.  To use these
>  >>  >  >  properly /Files/Compile should be group sys and permission g+ws.  
> This
>  >>  >  >  is done on 014.01 but it would be nice for these changes to happen 
> on
>  >>  >  >  old installs as well.  Unfortunately, Post_Install can't operate
>  >>  >  >  outside of $target/$target_settings.  Should there be a check in
>  >>  >  >  bin/Compile?  What's the best way?
>  >>  >  >
>  >>  >
>  >>  > This is an issue I've thought much about, but haven't found a clean 
> solution.
>  >>  >  If someone can come up with a clean solution, please post it. We need 
> it. If
>  >>  >  no clean solution is found, should we accept a workaround?
>  >>  >
>  >>  >  To recap the problem:
>  >>  >  Most users have used sudo or root to run Compile. This is 
> discuoraged, but
>  >>  >  there was no clean way to build some recipes without it before this 
> release
>  >>  >  of Compile. Because Compile was run with superuser privileges a lot of
>  >>  >  entried in /Files/Compile will be owned by that user and various 
> actions
>  >>  >  executed by normal user (which is the recommended way to run Compile)
>  >>  >  will fail. We need to prevent that.
>  >>  >
>  >>  I'm holding the release until this issue is solved.
>  >>  But unforunatly I've been swamped with work since the end of last
>  >>  week, so I'm uncertain when I will be able to work on a solution.
>  >>
>  >>  Michael and I had a discussion about this issue before the weekend
>  >>  where we came to the conclussion thath the current implementation with
>  >>  "$sudo" (not "$sudo_exec"), which depend on if /Files/Compile is
>  >>  writable has to be reworked as it breaks if permissions mismatch for
>  >>  directories further down the hierarchy. But we didn't want to make any
>  >>  major changes this close to a release. Instead our idea is to
>  >>  implement a "backup" sudo call for when an operation fails. Depending
>  >>  on where in the hierarchy it should either call 'rm -rf' or 'chgrp
>  >>  sys/chmod g+rws'. For example permission errors on
>  >>  /Files/Compile/Recipes/Foo/x.y should trigger rm while permission
>  >>  errors on /Files/Compile/LocalRecipes should trigger chgrp. A
>  >>  recommendation would be to try a simple 'touch' before resource
>  >>  consuming actions (that might fail) like Unpack_Archive.
>  >>
>  >>  I don't know when I will be able to work on this and Michael said that
>  >>  he wont be able to work on this in the close future, so this is a
>  >>  request for anyone that has the oportunity to at least take a look at
>  >> it.
>  >
>  > In my machine at least, I just did a:
>  >
>  >   cd /Files/Compile
>  >   chown -R hisham:users *
>  >
>  > Has it been considered to advise users to do that when they upgrade
>  > instead of littering the code with lots of checks?
>  >
>  Yes, I've thought of that, but this will fail on multiple user systems. If
>  Jim tries to build while Joe owns the files it will fail.
>
>  --
>  /Jonas
>
>
>  > trying to teach my fingers not to type "sudo Compile" anymore :)
>
>  You can still type it, but it will have no effect anymore (beyond moving
>  the sudo authentication to right after you issue the command).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  gobolinux-devel mailing list
>  gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
>  http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
>
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel

Reply via email to