Re: [gobolinux-devel] Another GCC problem

2006-08-07 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 8/5/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 8/1/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To fix this, I added to the recipe the patch mailed to gcc's list in > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01179.html > > > > Is it OK to include th

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Another GCC problem

2006-08-05 Thread MJ Ray
"Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 8/1/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To fix this, I added to the recipe the patch mailed to gcc's list in > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01179.html > > > > Is it OK to include this in the Gobolinux recipe, please? > > By fol

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Another GCC problem

2006-08-01 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 8/1/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can rely on me to have hardware that finds bugs! It seems that GCC 4.1 uses fxsave on some Athlons (including mine) and this combines with another GCC bug so when a program is compiled with -ffast-math, then things may start segmentation fault-ing

[gobolinux-devel] Another GCC problem

2006-08-01 Thread MJ Ray
You can rely on me to have hardware that finds bugs! It seems that GCC 4.1 uses fxsave on some Athlons (including mine) and this combines with another GCC bug so when a program is compiled with -ffast-math, then things may start segmentation fault-ing. Read more at http://www.netdomination.org/~