On 7/30/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Log message:
If there is no Resources/Dependencies file, create one using
'GenBuildInformation',
not 'Dependencies'
--- CreatePackage 26 Jun 2006 23:21:01 - 1.14
+++ CreatePackage 30 Jul 2006 18:59:52 -
On 7/31/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/30/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Log message:
> If there is no Resources/Dependencies file, create one using
> 'GenBuildInformation',
> not 'Dependencies'
>
> --- CreatePackage 26 Jun 2006 23:21:01 -
I upgraded Compile recently to 1.5.1 and now some of my recipes
are failing because target is being passed in the environment
to make. This is a problem, because GNUstep-Make uses it to
decide whether we are cross-compiling or not. I'm unsetting
it with make_variables=("target=") in each GNUstep
On 7/31/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/30/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Log message:
> > If there is no Resources/Dependencies file, create one using
> > 'GenBuildInformation',
> > not 'Depend
On 7/31/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I upgraded Compile recently to 1.5.1 and now some of my recipes
are failing because target is being passed in the environment
to make. This is a problem, because GNUstep-Make uses it to
decide whether we are cross-compiling or not. I'm unsetting
it
On 7/31/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since BuildInformation is of an advisory nature only, would it be a
bad thing to generate it at CreatePackage time in case it is missing?
It may not be "build-time information" properly speaking, but if the
package was built locally by hand,
Experimenting a bit with Unmanaged together with trying out the idea of
making the kernel aware of third party modules.
First Unmanaged:
Why does the file Resources/UnmanagedFiles exist? Is there an idea that
the files should be removed when the program is removed/disabled?
Otherwise one cou
What is the best behaviour for Dependencies at meta-recipes?
After thinking a little bit about it, I think the following items
should be respected / assumed:
- The meta-recipe must accumulate all dependencies for its 'childs';
- There is no need for dependencies checking when compiling each child
On 7/31/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I upgraded Compile recently to 1.5.1 and now some of my recipes
> are failing because target is being passed in the environment
> to make. This is a problem, because GNUstep-Make uses it to
> d
2006/7/28, Rui Andrada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/25/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/25/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any objections on moving the
> > contents of NetworkInterface to the Network script? The only
> > difference visible to end use
10 matches
Mail list logo
