El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:11:38 -0300
"Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió
> Great, that's where the symlink should point to. Do you have a patch
> so that I can update the script?
>
I'm making some more changes relatives to no standard places, i will
commit a patch with all changes th
On 5/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/29/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I know this has come up before, multiple times, and it never goes
> > anywhere.
>
> And here we go again! :) Just kidding. I'm fully convinced we need USE
> flags or something
On 5/3/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, I don't know how well Xorg works with its parts separated in
> > /Programs -- there might be path issues to fix. Maybe an intermediate
> > approach could be used; if my memory ser
On 5/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > My main comment is to reiterate that USE flags are welcome. I have an
> > > abstract sentiment that part of it could be automated with optional
> > > dependencies (ie, "don't build th
