https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #14 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Packaged in golang-github-go-mgo-mgo. It can be closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
golang mailing list
go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fpoko...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|l...@fedoraproject.org |l...@redhat.com
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@switzerlandmail.ch
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
John Skeoch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|l...@redhat.com |jk...@redhat.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #10 from Vincent Batts ---
added comment for source packing
SPEC: http://vbatts.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/golang-labix-mgo.spec
SRPM:
http://vbatts.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/golang-labix-mgo-2013.11.18-0.3.bzr251.el6.s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #9 from Vincent Batts ---
sorry, i set the default tag to "go1", which is always the latest in their
project.
For any given tag, like r2013.11.18, run it like
TAG=r2013.11.18 sh pack_sources.sh
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #8 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Also, running 'sh pack_sources.sh' generates mgo-go1-253.tar.gz (using latest
rev number). Perhaps we want to enter rev number in the script itself (if I'm
reading it right, the script currently gets th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #7 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
that being a minor issue, i'll do a final run and approve this in a bit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
gola
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #6 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
the rev number needs an edit in the tarball filename too :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
golang mailing l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #5 from Vincent Batts ---
Created attachment 846190
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=846190&action=edit
script to pack the tagged snapshot of the source
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Batts ---
Since their "releases" is just a snapshot, and they do not even provide a
tarball, I would like to keep the revno in the release.
I've attached a script to pack the source. I'll include this script in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #3 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
The version number here is probably more like a snapshot release timestamp.
In that case the timestamp is probably better off in %{release} as per this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
--- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
In this case since we have an upstream version number, the %{release} tag
should be 1%{dist}.
Also, since upstream doesn't maintain tarballs, it's perhaps preferable to
include in comments the steps to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033797
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||golang@lists.fedoraproject.
17 matches
Mail list logo
