proletarius101 added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Yeah. Not trying to really support `replace` but was asking how to deal with
such case is acceptable and right for Fedora.
Now I know that just to replace the goipath to its real one by patches. Thanks
for answering!
``
To
The status of the issue: `Add macro for packages with `replace` in go.mod` of
project: `go-rpm-macros` has been updated to: Closed by proletarius101.
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/27
___
golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
rpm dependencies are transitive. That means replace can not be supported in
rpm. That means the only sane way to handle replace is to remove it by patching
code imports (which is not long or hard)
As to why non-transitive deps and 'to
proletarius101 added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Agreed that it looks messy. But in this case `replace` just means redirection
and some name overlapping. Or maybe there should be some notes in Fedora's
packaging guidelines to instruct the best practice to handle this?
``
To
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
replace can not work in Fedora anyway because it is not transitive (it’s the
kind of broken by design idea people invent when their primary target is to
bundle piles of junk and avoid fixing their code).
source code that uses replace
proletarius101 reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that
you are following:
``
Although go-rpm-macros haven't support Go modules, which bascially means no
lockfile & always use the latest deps available in Fedora's repo, it might be
good to provide some macro to
