jcajka commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that was
merged in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
@nim if you are not looking for feedback keep it open for some time and then
merge it with something like tested here in this way forks for me or just
commit
nim commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that was merged
in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
@bex sadly there are not many (any?) good wills to do regular reviewing. The
repo history shows long periods of one-man commits, be it now or when the
bex commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that was merged
in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
@nim it is customary in almost every project I have been in that someone
doesn't merge their own commit unless time has passed/emergency situations.
I think what
nim commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that was merged
in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
Ah, that
Just because it is trivial does not mean stupid typos can not happen, so the
commits cook in a private feature branch (where I can rewrite git history
ignatenkobrain commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that
was merged in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
I mean, if it is trivial - just commit it. I this not first PR where this
happens.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
nim commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that was merged
in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
@ignatenkobrain sorry, I didn't know there was much interest in reviewing such
a trivial commit (or in go-rpm-macros PRs in general). If you have any comment
on
ignatenkobrain commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that
was merged in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
I would appreciate if you would not merge your own PRs in one minute after
opening.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
nim opened a new pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following:
``
make it use the actual code that was merged in redhat-rpm-config-130
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/16
nim merged a pull-request against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
make it use the actual code that was merged in redhat-rpm-config-130
``
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/pull-request/16
___
golang mailing
