Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-02-01 Thread nicolas . mailhot
De: "Jakub Cajka" >> Filling upstream holes is pretty much the definition of an >> integrator/distributor role. In Go they are particularly numerous and deep, >> but Fedora users do want their docker and kubernetes (and Kubernetes, BTW, >> is astonishingly free of the problems that plague many Go

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-02-01 Thread nicolas . mailhot
De: "Owen Taylor" > I'm embarrassed to admit that before I sent my mail I carefully read over > ... the old PackageDrafts/Go :-( My only excuse is that it was in my > browser history. NP, that gave you some context on where Fedora is today. > Having actually read the relevant parts of "More Go P

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-02-01 Thread Jakub Cajka
- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "Discussion of RPM packaging > standards and practices for Fedora" > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 2:51:13 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-02-01 Thread nicolas . mailhot
De: "Jakub Cajka" Hi Jakub, > It depends (as everything) on available manpower, if you are willing to own > your dependencies > you can package anything and everything debundled. Sure, but available manpower depends on how high the bar you put for people wanting to join, and right now this b

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-02-01 Thread Owen Taylor
Hi Nicolas, I'm embarrassed to admit that before I sent my mail I carefully read over ... the old PackageDrafts/Go :-( My only excuse is that it was in my browser history. Having actually read the relevant parts of "More Go Packaging", the explanation of compat packages and notification procedure

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-02-01 Thread Jakub Cajka
- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "Discussion of RPM packaging > standards and practices for Fedora" > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 11:21:59 AM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packagin

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-02-01 Thread nicolas . mailhot
- Mail original - De: "Owen Taylor" Hi Owen, > Is there a guide for Fedora packagers about how to handle unbundling for > golang packages? The draft guidelines don't seem to go into any details. I don't think there is, nor that it is necessarily needed. The posted guidelines should be

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

2018-02-01 Thread Jakub Cajka
- Original Message - > From: "Owen Taylor" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Discussion of RPM packaging standards > and practices for Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 6:50:21 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging