nim commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that was merged
in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
@bex sadly there are not many (any?) good wills to do regular reviewing. The
repo history shows long periods of one-man commits, be it now or when the
bex commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that was merged
in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
@nim it is customary in almost every project I have been in that someone
doesn't merge their own commit unless time has passed/emergency situations.
I think what
nim commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that was merged
in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
Ah, that
Just because it is trivial does not mean stupid typos can not happen, so the
commits cook in a private feature branch (where I can rewrite git history
ignatenkobrain commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that
was merged in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
I mean, if it is trivial - just commit it. I this not first PR where this
happens.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
nim commented on the pull-request: `make it use the actual code that was merged
in redhat-rpm-config-130` that you are following:
``
@ignatenkobrain sorry, I didn't know there was much interest in reviewing such
a trivial commit (or in go-rpm-macros PRs in general). If you have any comment
on
