[go-rpm-macros] Issue #18: Passing extra args to `go test`
qulogic reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` While `gocheckflags` exists, it gets passed to `go-rpm-integration`, but ignored after that. For example, if I add: ``` %global gocheckflags -timeout 30m ``` then it appears when `go-rpm-integration` is called: ``` + go-rpm-integration check -i go.etcd.io/bbolt -b /builddir/build/BUILD/bbolt-1.3.3/_build/bin -s /builddir/build/BUILD/bbolt-1.3.3/_build -V 1.3.3-1.fc31 -p /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/golang-etcd-bbolt-1.3.3-1.fc31.x86_64 -g /usr/share/gocode -timeout 30m -v Testingin: /builddir/build/BUILD/bbolt-1.3.3/_build/src PATH: /builddir/build/BUILD/bbolt-1.3.3/_build/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/sbin GOPATH: /builddir/build/BUILD/bbolt-1.3.3/_build:/usr/share/gocode GO111MODULE: off command: go test -buildmode pie -compiler gc -ldflags "-X go.etcd.io/bbolt/version=1.3.3 -extldflags '-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld '" testing: go.etcd.io/bbolt ``` but it's not there in the `command: go test ...`. I also tried `export GO_TEST_FLAGS="-timeout 30m"`, but this gets overwritten by something else. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/18 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch
qulogic added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I've pushed a new `golist` and rebuilt all of the packages here except `golang-github-klauspost-crc32`, because that one doesn't seem to parse properly. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/17 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch
The status of the issue: `Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch` of project: `go-rpm-macros` has been updated to: Closed by qulogic. https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/17 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[golist] PR #25: Always install SFiles whatever the arch
qulogic merged a pull-request against the project: `golist` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Always install SFiles whatever the arch `` https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[golist] PR #25: Always install SFiles whatever the arch
qulogic commented on the pull-request: `Always install SFiles whatever the arch` that you are following: `` LGTM. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[golist] PR #25: Always install SFiles whatever the arch
eclipseo commented on the pull-request: `Always install SFiles whatever the
arch` that you are following:
``
Used:
```
Value: {".proto", ".md", ".s"},
```
We're still using the v1 of urfave/cli. v2 never caught up and the whole
project seems abandoned since 2016.
Tested in COPR and it works:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/golang-ng/build/935905/
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25
___
golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[golist] PR #25: Always install SFiles whatever the arch
nim commented on the pull-request: `Always install SFiles whatever the arch`
that you are following:
``
Ok, weird that @jchaloup gone to all this pain for something that does not work
Reading the urfave/cli documentation (that I don’t know well, I used
jawher/mow.cli in modist), it seems you need to define a default extension value
```
cli.NewStringSlice(".s", ".proto")
```
(https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/392)
and then set it as value
```
Value: cli.NewStringSlice(".s", ".proto")
```
here https://pagure.io/golist/blob/master/f/cmd/golist/golist.go#_80
But, I may be misreading the documentation, and I have no access to by coding
setup right now :( It needs testing
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25
___
golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[golist] PR #25: Always install SFiles whatever the arch
eclipseo commented on the pull-request: `Always install SFiles whatever the arch` that you are following: `` It seems the "other files" are not included by default but need to be specified with --include-extension. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[golist] PR #25: Always install SFiles whatever the arch
eclipseo commented on the pull-request: `Always install SFiles whatever the arch` that you are following: `` Tested and it doesn't work. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[golist] PR #25: Always install SFiles whatever the arch
eclipseo commented on the pull-request: `Always install SFiles whatever the arch` that you are following: `` > I assume you checked it builds and works I haven't. But I assume it would work. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[golist] PR #25: Always install SFiles whatever the arch
nim commented on the pull-request: `Always install SFiles whatever the arch` that you are following: `` That looks good to me (I assume you checked it builds and works). That's how I would have done it. @qulogic up to you now `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch
eclipseo added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/17 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[golist] PR #25: Always install SFiles whatever the arch
eclipseo opened a new pull-request against the project: `golist` that you are following: `` Always install SFiles whatever the arch `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @qulogic reading `golist` code, it should just need the same kind of processing as for protobuf files https://pagure.io/golist/blob/master/f/pkg/util/util.go#_77 (assuming we want all .s files added inconditionally) `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/17 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` That’s not hard to do (just add the flag to %goinstallflags ) but this variable is almost empty now, because all past file selection mistakes where fixed in `golist` @qulogic do you need the workaround added to `go-rpm-macros` or can you fix it `golist`-side in time for @eclipseo ? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/17 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today
- Original Message - > From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 4:20:40 PM > Subject: Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 04:39:07AM -0400, Jakub Cajka wrote: > > > F31 change page: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopt_new_Go_Packaging_Guidelines > > > and approval: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2120 > > > > It seems that this change has been accepted as Self Contained Change > > but IMHO it is System Wide Change as it seems to affect (nearly) all > > Go based packages in distribution(and will require work/attention of > > people that are not change owners, actually not accounted for in > > change proposal). For past several releases I have been doing rebase > > of Go compiler change(yet to be filed for F31) that is IMHO > > comparable(maybe a bit smaller) in scope and they were always deemed > > by FESCO as System Wide Changes. This really leaves me > > confused. Could someone from FESCO clarify? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy#Self_contained_changes says > > Examples include [...] a coordinated effort within a SIG with > > limited impact outside the SIG's functional area > > So in this case, even though the change affects so many packages, it > falls into the "self contained change" category. > > That said, the difference between "system-wide" and "self-contained" > boils down to two things: some additional data required in the change > page, and filing the change a bit earlier. In this case the additional > data is mostly there in the change page, and the change was filed early, > so even if we were to change the Change to "system-wide", the effect > would be cosmetic. > > Zbyszek Thank you for clarification :). IMO it would be great if that has been recorded in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy#Self_contained_changes, this approach can't be really inferred from it(at least I don't see it there). With that popped on my mind that may be calling it "early/late window change" would fit better along with recording the complexity of the change, rather then system wide, contained change. But this is really just my brain storm. Unfortunately no early changes for me as Golang release are aligned late in to the Fedora devel cycle. JC > ___ > devel mailing list -- de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #3: %goprep should apply patches automatically
jcajka added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I second @eclipseo. Autopatch would add complexities in complex situations(would made using goprep impossible). Notably I have on my mind architecture specific patches, which are not possible with autopatch. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/3 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch
eclipseo reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are
following:
``
Remember we said we want noarch packages? So we include *all* files whatever
the arch with IgnoredGoFiles.
SFiles are similar as they can be specific to an arch, but we don't have a
"IgnoredSFiles" option to include them in all builds, so we end up with
packages which are not exactly the same on every arch:
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35534910
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35535838
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35536361
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35537198
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35537483
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35537702
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35539134
The immediate solution would be to include all files with the .s extension:
```golist --include-extension .s --to-install --package-path ${goipath}
$(expandflags)```
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/17
___
golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #3: %goprep should apply patches automatically
eclipseo added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I don't think it's needed really, it would complexify %goprep. We can use %autopatch after %goprep to the same effect. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/3 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today
- Original Message - > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > To: "Jakub Cajka" > Cc: golang@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Development discussions related to > Fedora" > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:23:34 AM > Subject: Re: New Go Packaging Guidelines landed in rawhide (koji) today > > Le 2019-06-12 10:39, Jakub Cajka a écrit : > > >> Fedora’s new Go packaging macros landed in rawhide (koji) today. > >> > > > > I thought that we have agreed on Go SIG meeting with eclipseo to do > > this in side tag along with golang rebase(to avoid 2 rebuilds), > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopt_new_Go_Packaging_Guidelines#Summary > > “ This proposal consists of: > Packaging the new Go macros: go-rpm-macros > Getting the Guidelines approved by the FPC > Updating all Go libraries with the new macros > Mass-rebuilding all the Go package in a side tag ” > > You complain that step 3 and 4 are separate, but that’s how it was > planed from the start up and approved in the change page. > > You're conflating merging two mass Go package rebuilds (one for the new > Go compiler, and another for the new, and first, Go packaging > guidelines) with merging step 3 and 4 (which would have had other > drawbacks, that were never discussed, because that's not how we planed > things). > > And BTW it was already so in > https://pagure.io/GoSIG/go-sig/issue/20 6 months ago (though this page > is obsolete, you made us rewrite the plan in so many formats over time > I've lost track or what is up to date or not. The change page is up to > date, it’s the most recent rewrite) I guess that we have not agreed on the SIG meeting then. I don't complain and this is not in any ways personal, keep it on mind please. The change proposal predates that SIG discussion as other bit predates the change proposal. I'm pointing out that we could have avoided any breakage if we did few thing slightly differently. Currently by your actions there are several FTBFS packages, it is not really a serious issues(as I'm sure that eclipso will fix up all the packages that need it in time for Fedora 31, kudos for committing for that work :)) but it is unnecessary and avoidable inconvenience that I(and I guess others too) will have to account for(spend some time on). In my case preparing for Go rebase(I do scratch rebuilds). One of the points been also possibility to fit in the Go rebase in to that side tag, but after further discussion with eclipseo on Wednesday it will make more sense to use regular mass-rebuild for that(as I usually do) assuming that the side tag rebuild will conclude 1-2w prior to it(so I will be able to observe dist git in coherent shape). JC > > Sincerely, > > -- > Nicolas Mailhot > ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #4: Issues building golang source package on EL7
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Closing, since the root cause is actually the same as issue #2 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/4 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #4: Issues building golang source package on EL7
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Closing, since the root cause is actually the same as issue #2 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/4 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #7: %goinstall should verify explicit paths exist
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` And the fix is now in rawhide, with go-rpm-macros 3.0.8 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/7 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #7: %goinstall should verify explicit paths exist
The status of the issue: `%goinstall should verify explicit paths exist` of project: `go-rpm-macros` has been updated to: Closed by nim. https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/7 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #1: -devel subpackage is build tag specific
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` This should be fixed with golist 0.10.0 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/1 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #2: EPEL availability
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` A POC implementation is here https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/macros-ng/builds/ `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/2 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #2: EPEL availability
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` A POC implementation is here https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/macros-ng/builds/ `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/2 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #6: golist needs to be run outside the source tree to avoid panics
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Modules are now disabled by default, module mode will require a new tooling stack refresh anyway. Closing `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/6 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #6: golist needs to be run outside the source tree to avoid panics
The status of the issue: `golist needs to be run outside the source tree to avoid panics` of project: `go-rpm-macros` has been updated to: Closed by nim. https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/6 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
[go-rpm-macros] Issue #4: Issues building golang source package on EL7
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` So, the whole Go tooling update and cleanup is now finished in rawhide. The corresponding tooling port to EL7 is here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/macros-ng/builds/ (lightly tested, but it should handle all the divergences between rawhide and EL7) I'm not sure I have enough karma and energy left to get in merged officially EL7-side. The process Fedora-side was already exhausting. If that's of interest to someone, the maintainers to lobby are the epel-rpm-macro and golang ones. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/4 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to golang-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/golang@lists.fedoraproject.org
