[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch

2019-06-14 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
qulogic added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` I've pushed a new `golist` and rebuilt all of the packages here except `golang-github-klauspost-crc32`, because that one doesn't seem to parse properly. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch

2019-06-14 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
The status of the issue: `Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch` of project: `go-rpm-macros` has been updated to: Closed by qulogic. https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/17 ___ golang mailing list -- golang@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch

2019-06-14 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
eclipseo added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/25 `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/issue/17 ___ golang mailing list --

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch

2019-06-14 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` @qulogic reading `golist` code, it should just need the same kind of processing as for protobuf files https://pagure.io/golist/blob/master/f/pkg/util/util.go#_77 (assuming we want all .s files added inconditionally) `` To reply, visit

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch

2019-06-14 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
nim added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` That’s not hard to do (just add the flag to %goinstallflags ) but this variable is almost empty now, because all past file selection mistakes where fixed in `golist` @qulogic do you need the workaround added to `go-rpm-macros` or can

[go-rpm-macros] Issue #17: Go does not install SFiles not required by the arch

2019-06-14 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
eclipseo reported a new issue against the project: `go-rpm-macros` that you are following: `` Remember we said we want noarch packages? So we include *all* files whatever the arch with IgnoredGoFiles. SFiles are similar as they can be specific to an arch, but we don't have a "IgnoredSFiles"