[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2020-02-03 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
qulogic merged a pull-request against the project: `golist` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Fix not listing packages with external tests only `` https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/27 ___ golang mailing list --

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2020-02-03 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
qulogic commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` Oh, and of course, that's what the recently merged PR#26 does, so there's no need to modify this PR to do it too (unless you want to rebase.) `` To reply, visit the link below

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2020-02-02 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
qulogic commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` This breaks a few things, e.g., [ golang-github-pquerna-otp ](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/qulogic/golist-pr27/build/1217039/), [

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2020-02-01 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
qulogic commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` This would affect approximately 200 packages. Since this determines which test files to run, it could have some possible consequences for the build, but probably not the final

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2020-02-01 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
qulogic commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` Coming back to what this PR is actually about, there may be one more case of `TestGoFiles` that you haven't changed to add `XTestGoFiles` in `BuildArtifact`, though I'm not

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2020-01-31 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
qulogic commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` > @obudai a lot of Go projects use internal in the package path to mean the > same thing as the internal keyword. Welcome to the wonderful land of > underspecified Go

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2019-12-02 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
nim commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` @jcajka the macros do not add any policy over golist output. Any policy is manual use of override switches by packagers in their spec As for upstreams… you realise that telling

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2019-12-02 Thread Jakub Čajka
jcajka commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` @nim I have assumed that this has been transparently handled in the new macros. I guess there should be some way whatever in the macros or document it in the guidelines that

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2019-11-29 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
nim commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` @jcajka I agree from a theoretical POW. I was just pointing out that from a practical POW, asking all the Go parts we package to adhere strictly to the specs, means dealing with a

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2019-11-29 Thread Jakub Čajka
jcajka commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` @nim TBH I don't think that we should be creating our own dialect of Go(even from tooling perspective). What you are suggesting is basically it. We should respect upstream specs

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2019-11-29 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
nim commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` @obudai a lot of Go projects use internal in the package path to mean the same thing as the internal keyword. Welcome to the wonderful land of underspecified Go behaviour.

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2019-11-29 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
nim commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` That would wreck havoc on all package BRs since internal is a magic keyword that forbids exposing the result to other Go packages. Returning anything internal in `golist` must be

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2019-11-29 Thread Ondřej Budai
obudai commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` Running ``` golist --provided --tests --package-path github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer ``` Without fix: ``` github.com/osbuild/osbuild-composer/internal/crypt

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2019-11-29 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
qulogic commented on the pull-request: `Fix not listing packages with external tests only` that you are following: `` Do you have an example? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/27 ___

[golist] PR #27: Fix not listing packages with external tests only

2019-11-29 Thread Ondřej Budai
obudai opened a new pull-request against the project: `golist` that you are following: `` Fix not listing packages with external tests only `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/golist/pull-request/27 ___