Hi,
I wonder how in a world of go modules without a GOPATH,
code completion within editors is supposed to be implemented?
Best,
Benny
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 6:51 PM, wrote:
>
> https://play.golang.org/p/mr58JS4WsJV
>
> Okay, I realize now that I didn't do a very good job in my first post of
> explaining my problem, so I'll trying again. In the above code I need to
> signal(sigint or sigterm) the exec.CommandContext on line 69
I've done some further exploring.
The expression computed by the line
https://github.com/MarkNahabedian/Goshua/blob/ee72218487f39d2e97ade086df23dbcfcb4c2db3/rete/rule_compiler/rule_compiler.go#L214
has both a valid Pos() and a valid End(). parseExpression is defined at
Did you happen to install it using another go1.11 beta build in module mode?
If so, it could have been https://golang.org/issue/26869.
On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 4:35:31 PM UTC-4, Ken MacDonald wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Just attempted to install 1.11beta3. Using the following instructions, the
>
https://play.golang.org/p/mr58JS4WsJV
Okay, I realize now that I didn't do a very good job in my first post of
explaining my problem, so I'll trying again. In the above code I need to
signal(sigint or sigterm) the exec.CommandContext on line 69 that is
blocking so it will stop and finish the
I think the confusion comes from how you're exposing each interface -- or
rather, how you seem to imply their use.
In your example, you provide packages pet and filepath each of which define
a Walk interface *plus* one or more structs that implement that interface.
But, neither package
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:03 PM, wrote:
> Hi Sam, I'm running 1.10.3 on High Sierra, installed via brew.
>
> Here's some more helpful output:
>
> ➜ awesomeProject go version
> go version go1.10.3 darwin/amd64
> ➜ awesomeProject gofmt test.go
>
> package main
>
> var m_19_chars = map[string]int{
Hi Ken,
If "go get" succeeded, then probably this put something in
$GOPATH/bin/go1.11beta3, but bash being unable to find it means that
$GOPATH/bin is not in your $PATH environment variable; so bash can't find
it. Try "$GOPATH/bin/go1.11beta3 download" or try adding $GOPATH/bin to
your $PATH,
Hi Sam, I'm running 1.10.3 on High Sierra, installed via brew.
Here's some more helpful output:
➜ awesomeProject go version
go version go1.10.3 darwin/amd64
➜ awesomeProject gofmt test.go
package main
var m_19_chars = map[string]int{
"i": 0,
"iii": 0,
"iii": 0,
}
var
Hi,
Just attempted to install 1.11beta3. Using the following instructions, the
"go get" portion appears to have succeeded, but "go1.11beta3 download"
fails with "bash: go1.11beta3: command not found". This worked fine on my
Mac, but trying on a CentOS system now. Suggestions welcome.
> If you
I can't reproduce this behavior. What version of Go are you running?
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018, at 14:27, russo...@gmail.com wrote:
> With the following code, running go fmt shows different behavior depending
> on the (1) length of the keys, and (2) the order of the keys.
>
> var m_19_chars =
With the following code, running go fmt shows different behavior depending
on the (1) length of the keys, and (2) the order of the keys.
var m_19_chars = map[string]int{
"i": 0,
"iii": 0,
"iii": 0,
}
var m_18_chars = map[string]int{
"i": 0,
"iii":
On 9 Aug 2018, at 18:13, Kevin Locke wrote:
>
> That is great! `gobin -u` is very close to what I was looking for.
> I think it will be sufficient for my needs. Thank you!
>
> I'm surprised this isn't part of the go tool, since it seems like all
> system administrators would need to use gobin
A http2 crawler with custom transport chokes on URIs with double slashes.
Is it a bug? Testcase:
func TestDoubleSlashInUrl(t *testing.T) {
url := "https://http2.akamai.com//demo;
tr := {}
if e := http2.ConfigureTransport(tr); e != nil {
t.Fatal("Could not configure h2 transport")
}
cl :=
Modular power in Golang
> func power(x,y,p int64) int64 { var res int64 res = 1; // Initialize
> result x =(x%p)%mod; // Update x if it is more than or // equal to p for
> y>0{ // If y is odd, multiply x with result if y & 1==1{ res =
> ((res*x)%p)%mod; } // y must be even now y = y/2; x =
Bitpacked data pretty-formatter. Zero dependencies. 176 LoC.
Every single input bit from 0 to 63 can print a label that show this bit
state. Arbitrary group of bits can be printed as decimal, octal or hex
numbers and as C32s, Ascii7b or Utf-8 characters. Plus as an IPv4
address in dot-notation.
On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 06:18 +, Jakob Borg wrote:
> On 9 Aug 2018, at 00:09, Kevin Locke wrote:
>> Thanks for the explanation! Is there a way for me to update the
>> locally installed packages (shfmt and its dependencies in this
>> example) without installing additional dependencies which
See this blog post for more interesting ways to handle goroutine
communication and synchronization:
http://nomad.uk.net/articles/interesting-ways-of-using-go-channels.html
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 04:59:48 UTC+1, natea...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> https://play.golang.org/p/d5n9bYmya3r
>
> I'm new
Just re-organise the code a bit, try
this: https://play.golang.org/p/GMpfZlCNP9G
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 04:59:48 UTC+1, natea...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> https://play.golang.org/p/d5n9bYmya3r
>
> I'm new to the go language and trying to figure out how to sigint a
> blocking goroutine. in the
Tong Sun
"I've never seen [the Author delete the library] happen before."
It happened recently. Take a look at jteeuwen/go-bindata: Hard fork of
jteeuwen/go-bindata because it disappeared,
Peter
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 10:01:32 AM UTC-4, Tong Sun wrote:
>
> I've never seen that
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 8:14 PM Manlio Perillo wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 9:50:55 AM UTC+2, Jay G wrote:
>>
>> Let's say I'm writing some library for internal usage in my project, what's
>> the idiomatic way to design visibility of struct members?
>>
>> Option 1. export structs
On Thursday, August 9, 2018 at 9:50:55 AM UTC+2, Jay G wrote:
>
> Let's say I'm writing some library for internal usage in my project,
> what's the idiomatic way to design visibility of struct members?
>
>- Option 1. export structs and members as much as possible. Only hide
>ones that
Hi
I would suggest to use the second option. If you export all possible
members, you have to care on every redesign who and how this members are
used. This makes a redesign unnecessarily tricky.
Constructor functions are a common pattern in go code and therefore you
should not flinch to use
Let's say I'm writing some library for internal usage in my project, what's
the idiomatic way to design visibility of struct members?
- Option 1. export structs and members as much as possible. Only hide
ones that need to be protected, e.g. by a lock
- Option 2. hide as much as
Who would walk his dog on a file path?
Seriously.
There os no need to technically forbid something
nobody will do. Someone who is not willing to read
or incapable of understand your documentation of
the interface won't be able to use it properly anyway.
Go is not done through "Ctrl+Space driven
As far as I know, there are three ways you can deal with this.
First, you can introduce a dummy private method in your interface, so as to
differentiate it from other interfaces. The implementing struct will need to
implement this dummy method. I don't like this approach for one bit, because it
On 9 Aug 2018, at 00:09, Kevin Locke
mailto:ke...@kevinlocke.name>> wrote:
Thanks for the explanation! Is there a way for me to update the
locally installed packages (shfmt and its dependencies in this
example) without installing additional dependencies which weren't
initially installed?
You
27 matches
Mail list logo
