On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 9:42 AM Ian Denhardt wrote:
>
> Quoting Burak Serdar (2018-10-19 17:01:42)
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 1:09 PM Ian Denhardt wrote:
> > >
> > > Quoting Burak Serdar (2018-10-19 14:09:46)
> > >
> > > > It is useful in a linked list. You can instantiate a linked list
> > > >
I think it's fair to say that dealing with untyped numeric constants is one
of the most opaque areas of the draft design and I remember thinking when I
first read it that a clearer and more intuitive solution would have to be
found.
As far as the 'excluded types' idea is concerned, I can't
Hello,
I am quite new to golang and has been programming python and c++ for a while.
I use python heapq.merge to merge sort multiple already-sorted queues in
generator style.
I am wondering if golang already has anything to do this, or I should somehow
implement my own using priority queues?
Quoting alan.f...@gmail.com (2018-10-20 16:59:52)
>I haven't checked them all but I did notice one example which your
>paper doesn't appear to cover, namely the add1K example which has been
>a stumbling block for a lot of proposals including my own though I did
>eventually find a
Quoting Andy Balholm (2018-10-20 17:34:15)
> It’s just one of probably dozens of types of operations that people
> will want generic types to be able to support, besides method calls and
> operators. Adding support for them wouldn’t be very hard either, but by
> the time you got done, the result
Ian D,
I'm sorry that we had a mis-understanding regarding the introduction to my
paper but I hope you now understand why I made the remarks I did.
To turn to the technical issues.
I haven't checked them all but I did notice one example which your paper
doesn't appear to cover, namely the
Mandolyte,
Pleased you liked the approach :)
That's four of us now who favor changing the type parameter section from
parentheses to square brackets, so we're building a bit of a consensus on
that particular aspect.
Alan
On Saturday, October 20, 2018 at 2:31:29 PM UTC+1, Mandolyte wrote:
>
>
Currently I don't use them, but couldn't binary packages be used to
distribute CGO-dependent packages for developers who might not have a C
cross-compiler? I think the feature would be more commonly used if it
wasn't so impractical. Rather than abandoning the feature I'd like to see
it
Hallo,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:45:04AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > Unhelpfully, I imagine it unlikely that anyone distributing binary go
> > packages reads golang-dev or golang-nuts.
>
> Is there a more likely place to reach such people?
I believe the best ways to reach attention on
Quoting Andy Balholm (2018-10-20 13:30:58)
> There are some contracts in the draft design that can’t be expressed with the
> “implements” syntax as it stands. Some would be fairly simple syntax
> extensions, but others describe the relationship between two types rather
> than just the
Yes! Just tried.
Thanks for giving me the idea about kicking the slashes from file name.
From: golang-nuts@googlegroups.com on behalf of
Tamás Gulácsi
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 12:12:13 AM
To: golang-nuts
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Escape slashes from file path
strings.Replace(fn, "/", "-", -1) ?
You can use other transcodings (quopri, base64) but those needs decoding, too.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
I need the whole name :( the slash isn't separating the directory. It's
"artist/track.mp3"
From: golang-nuts@googlegroups.com on behalf of
Tamás Gulácsi
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2018 12:00:08 AM
To: golang-nuts
Subject: [go-nuts] Escape slashes from file path
Use filepath.Base to strip the directory part.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
Very interesting :-)
It looks like a useful tool for producing a first rough cut of a python
program.
-- Nick
On 20/10/18 05:16, Raffaele Sena wrote:
Inspired by ESR pytogo (and tired of writing python code), I went the
complete opposite way and came up with pygor:
I have linked the webpage for this thread on the error handling feedback
wiki
https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Go2ErrorHandlingFeedback
Could someone link it on the other wikis?
On Wednesday, October 17, 2018 at 4:46:13 PM UTC-7, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Please
There are some contracts in the draft design that can’t be expressed with the
“implements” syntax as it stands. Some would be fairly simple syntax
extensions, but others describe the relationship between two types rather than
just the operations on a single type. No extension of interfaces
```
{
"name":"foo/bar.mp3",
"url":"https://foobar.com/bar.mp3;
}
```
I wanna save the song after fetching the url.
When I am going to save the file to the `name` value it says `open: foo/bar.mp3
no such`, because the directory `foo` doesn't exist.
I wanna save it in the current
Quoting robert engels (2018-10-20 12:15:52)
>To be clear, this is only for that "performance case", where I don't
>want LinkedList to allocate internal nodes to hold the elements but the
>reasoning applies when using a simple LinkedList, and I want it to hold
>MyObj (which is not
Agreed, the following is where the disconnect is
> On Oct 20, 2018, at 10:40 AM, Ian Denhardt wrote:
>
>> // Do we need LinkedList(T)? Maybe not..
>> func (l *LinkedList) Add(n *Node) {
>> n.next=nil
>> if l.head==nil {
>>l.head=n
>> } else {
>>l.head.next=n
>> }
>> }
if I declare
You (practically) cannot cross-compile with cgo. Use github.com/karalabe/xgo if
you have Docker.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Quoting Burak Serdar (2018-10-19 17:01:42)
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 1:09 PM Ian Denhardt wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Burak Serdar (2018-10-19 14:09:46)
> >
> > > It is useful in a linked list. You can instantiate a linked list
> > > template in a package, and use that concrete type in another package
Quoting alan.f...@gmail.com (2018-10-19 16:19:36)
>Ian D,
>The introduction is certainly not intended to be insulting to those who
>have put serious thought into the problem. If it were, then I'd be
>insulting myself as I've put serious thought into at least two other
>
I have test that use GOOS=linux GOARCH=amd64 can be compiled successful in
MacOS.
But I encounter problem when interfere with the github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3
which need cgo, so I enable the CGO_ENABLED=1
This is where is the error happen, the error message as bellow, how can I
fix it, thanks.
Alan, like your approach and nearly all your solutions (any quibbling I have
isn't worth mentioning).
And best of all, I think it would make excellent godoc documentation.
Thanks for taking the time to write this up.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi dharani,
I don't think the bigger questions about end products or services are so
much implied by the question.
BOPs are just one form of binary that have some problems for users and
maintainenance, and there are workarounds to supplying a package with
binary dependencies that don't
Thank, I feel I can work with this :)
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:58 AM roger peppe wrote:
> That transformation might be valid for the simple case you have there,
> where there's a single parameter of exactly the interface type, but generic
> functions allow much more than that. You can have
On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 at 22:41, Axel Wagner
wrote:
> As I said, I don't really understand why we disagree here - or what we are
> even disagreeing about. So let me make my claim as precise as possible, in
> the hope that it at least helps me understand which particular part you are
> disagreeing
28 matches
Mail list logo
