Re: [go-nuts] If Go is using libc instead of syscalls on macOS now, why is it not shown via otool -L?

2019-05-03 Thread Ivan Medoedov
Thanks very much. This is all very interesting. On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 2:20 AM wrote: > I don't have hard numbers on slowdowns. It will depend a lot on the binary > in question. > At the time I checked the compiler and linker and it did not slow those > down (to the accuracy of our benchmarks).

[go-nuts] Is it possible to use the Go linker to link C object files?

2019-05-03 Thread ivan . medoedov
Go linker is amazing. It's the only truly cross platform linker. Is it possible to use it to create binaries from object files compiled with C? For example main.c: int main() { puts("Hello"); return 0; } gcc -c -o main.o main.c go tool link main.o main.o: not package main -- You received t

Re: [go-nuts] If Go is using libc instead of syscalls on macOS now, why is it not shown via otool -L?

2019-05-03 Thread ivan . medoedov
I know that calling C functions via cgo is relatively expensive because of the goroutines, so there must be some optimizations/tricks to make all these libc calls fast. On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 12:21:27 AM UTC+2, ivan.m...@gmail.com wrote: > > Indeed, it works with Go 1.12. I have 3 different

Re: [go-nuts] If Go is using libc instead of syscalls on macOS now, why is it not shown via otool -L?

2019-05-03 Thread ivan . medoedov
Indeed, it works with Go 1.12. I have 3 different Go versions, and my aliasing was messed up. Sorry. > No. The Linux kernel, fortunately, supports static linking and provides a stable syscall API. There is no reason to make this change on GNU/Linux. Good to know, thanks. So Linux, BSD, Plan9

[go-nuts] If Go is using libc instead of syscalls on macOS now, why is it not shown via otool -L?

2019-05-03 Thread ivan . medoedov
Hello, I read the following from one of the contributors: > On Solaris (and Windows), and more recently in macOS as well we link with libc (or equivalent). > Go used to do raw system calls on macOS, and binaries were occasionally broken by kernel updates. Now Go uses libc on macOS. I just chec

Re: [go-nuts] Is Go a single pass compiler?

2019-02-27 Thread ivan . medoedov
Thanks, Ian. I remember reading in some compiler book that languages should be designed for a single pass to reduce compilation speed. Go proves that wrong :) It's amazingly fast, looks like computers are pretty good at traversing AST trees. On Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 11:50:05 PM UTC+1

[go-nuts] Is Go a single pass compiler?

2019-02-27 Thread ivan . medoedov
Hello, In Go functions can be used before they are defined, but as I understand, it's still possible to have a single pass compiler. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai