On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 19:14:43 +0530
Kathiresh Kumar wrote:
> How can I connect golang with mongoDB
>
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=How+can+I+connect+golang+with+mongoDB%3F%3F%3F%3F
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 11:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Matt Sherman wrote:
> Here’s a riff on generics focused on builtin typeclasses (instead of
> user contracts): https://clipperhouse.com/go-generics-typeclasses/
>
> Feedback welcome.
>
The main motivation behind generics has always been type-safe
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:56:24 +0530
Rohit Jain wrote:
>
> how do I solve this?
>
Wait for goimports to be updated. Until then, increase the dose of your
OCD medication till you stop caring about the difference.
MSB
--
It was funnier inside my head.
--
You received this message because you
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 16:54:35 -0700
Liam Breck wrote:
> Indeed, the problem is largely go fmt, I already raised this, but no
> one picked up on it:
>
> I use this one-liner:
>
> v := a; if t { v = b }
>
> This is not compatible with go fmt, but that tool's effects are
> undocumented (see issue
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Hoo Luu wrote:
> 在 2018年8月15日星期三 UTC+8上午12:43:37,Mark Volkmann写道:
>
> > var color = temperature > 100 ? “red” : “blue”
>
>
> Although this feature will not be accepted, we could just talk about
> it. I prefer 'if-expression' to ternary.
>
> var
On Sat, 26 May 2018 07:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
T L wrote:
> Looks the answer is not. But any one can confirm this?
I can tell you that your program does not have any defined behavior
according to the Go language standard, because your use of
unsafe.Pointer to reinterpret bytes as
On Sat, 26 May 2018 03:15:45 +
Li Jianhua wrote:
> 1. Why does C++ introduce move semantics anyway? What problems is
> it going to solve? 2. How come Golang, C (Without ++) don’t have
> that move semantics yet? Will they need the move soon?
>
C++ is a language used
On Wed, 23 May 2018 03:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
lafolle wrote:
> Thanks Mathias for clearing this out.
>
> I reasoned this out by looking at the address to which `i` was
> allocated to, though I wanted to _peek_ inside the slice's header to
> be affirmative. But I can't clearly
On Wed, 23 May 2018 13:29:17 +0530
Sankar P wrote:
> I extracted the confusing part alone, when appending to an array, the
> items are different than the resultant array into a separate go
> program.
>
> The Playground URL is: https://play.golang.org/p/BJM0H_rYNdb
>
On Tue, 15 May 2018 06:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
matthewju...@gmail.com wrote:
> I don’t think I’m suggesting to not disclaim liability. I’m
> suggesting to claim that I didn’t hide anything to make a use break
> on purpose. It does add liability, but this is liability that is
> completely in the
On Sun, 13 May 2018 08:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
matthewju...@gmail.com wrote:
> My tools are my responsibility, so I’m wondering what stops the GCC,
> Go, or other open source authors from including practical jokes.
That depends on the jurisdiction and the kind of practical joke. But
it's a fact that
On Fri, 11 May 2018 20:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Tashi Lu wrote:
> Hi gophers,
>
> I faced a strange problem: os/exec always fails with `fork/exec
> /usr/bin/qemu-img: invalid argument'.
>
> Simplified code is at https://play.golang.org/p/v1APfzmS2p9. It seems
> this
On Thu, 10 May 2018 08:33:32 +
Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This modified example from another thread does not compile:
You modified it in a pretty significant way. The original example had
type T = *T
which is a recursive type alias (which is disallowed). Your new example
has
13 matches
Mail list logo