[go-nuts] receiver parameters deserve as good a name as other parameters

Apart from fulfilling interfaces, function receives are just another parameter, right? "In Go, the receiver of a method is just another parameter and therefore, should be named accordingly" I agree and it inspires me to name receivers well, not to name them more cryptically than other

[go-nuts] What should be in doc.go besides comments and the package?

Should one define types in doc.go? Cheers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on

[go-nuts] Re: Will Go be discontinued?

Yeah, and GMail and Google Search: their days are numbered On Sunday, July 28, 2013 at 10:25:11 AM UTC-7 Starfish wrote: > Hello! > > Every Google service I use and like seems to get pulled. > > Recently Google announced the retirement of Reader, iGoogle, Talk and > Latitude. > > What