Re: [go-nuts] Re: Why we don't have simple throws error statement

2020-08-18 Thread Yasar Semih Alev
Another idea, if we use blank identifier for errors then throws statement catch these with caller function name. func printSum(a, b, c string) error { throws func(caller string, err error) { fmt.Println("caller:", caller, err) return err }() x, _ :=

[go-nuts] Re: Why we don't have simple throws error statement

2020-08-01 Thread Yasar Semih Alev
I did not see clear and simple either. As I wrote, I don't like complex solutions. Just trying to ask: why we don't have simple solution. The function just simple example, this isn't a draft or something. On Friday, 31 July 2020 at 23:25:26 UTC+3 b.ca...@pobox.com wrote: > On Friday, 31 July

[go-nuts] Re: Why we don't have simple throws error statement

2020-07-31 Thread Yasar Semih Alev
Note; I don't want to send any proposal currently. Firstly, I would like to share and discuss my idea with community. On Friday, 31 July 2020 at 17:06:33 UTC+3 Yasar Semih Alev wrote: > Hey Community, > > I know, there are so many discussion about error handling. I read tons of >