Just a quick IMHO,
The current proposal, where there is a type declaration between the
function name and the function arguments, pushes the function arguments too
far right. The function arguments, arguably, are more important (usually)
than the specifics of the types required.
Is there an option to move these to something like:
```
typedef FuncName(T1, T2 Stringer)
func FuncName(a T1, b T2) (T1, error) {
// ...
}
```
Note, INALL (I'm not a language lawyer)...
-Toby.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CA%2BfYmx1M9mHhbzk04eoKSSFYzGGX60m46NUwoxrBA4ooVFUpmg%40mail.gmail.com.
