Clearly that's a workaround though. Like how you can copy a slice of bytes
without calling copy by casting it to a string and then back to []bytes.
It gets the job done, but it's weird and not obvious.
On Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 12:14:19 PM UTC-7, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> Why not just accept
Why not just accept slices only and expect the caller to add a `[:]`? It's
not quite as ergonomic, but should have the same effect and we wouldn't
need to add complexity to the design.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 4:58 PM wrote:
> Right now as I understand it, I would still have to write a different
Right now as I understand it, I would still have to write a different
generic function for different length arrays, or one that accepted slices.
as per:
// Accept slices of T
func someSliceFunc(type T)(s []T){ ... }
// Accept a 1 member array of T
func someArrayFunc(type T)(a [1]T){ ... }
...
//
