On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:52 AM Sebastien Binet wrote:
> On Thu Nov 23, 2023 at 15:23 CET, 'Michael Knyszek' via golang-nuts wrote:
> > Also, I'd like to clarify:
> >
> > - [David]: is it a good idea to use cgo for Go-Python interop?
> > - [Michael]: no. better with pipe or RPC
> >
> > I'm
On Thu Nov 23, 2023 at 15:23 CET, 'Michael Knyszek' via golang-nuts wrote:
> Also, I'd like to clarify:
>
> - [David]: is it a good idea to use cgo for Go-Python interop?
> - [Michael]: no. better with pipe or RPC
>
> I'm wrong about this. A conversation after the meeting clarified a
>
Also, I'd like to clarify:
- [David]: is it a good idea to use cgo for Go-Python interop?
- [Michael]: no. better with pipe or RPC
I'm wrong about this. A conversation after the meeting clarified a
misunderstanding I had about Go->Python calls specifically. Both Go->Python
and Python->Go with
On Thu Nov 23, 2023 at 01:24 CET, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:31 AM Sebastien Binet
>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > In this week "compiler minutes" [1], one can read:
> >
> > """
> > - Go on future platforms (RAM efficiency. NUMA?)
> > - (maybe) Go-Python interop for
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:31 AM Sebastien Binet
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In this week "compiler minutes" [1], one can read:
>
> """
> - Go on future platforms (RAM efficiency. NUMA?)
> - (maybe) Go-Python interop for AI-powered applications
> - [David]: is it a good idea to use cgo for Go-Python
Hi there,
In this week "compiler minutes" [1], one can read:
"""
- Go on future platforms (RAM efficiency. NUMA?)
- (maybe) Go-Python interop for AI-powered applications
- [David]: is it a good idea to use cgo for Go-Python interop?
- [Michael]: no. better with pipe or RPC
"""
Would it be
