Re: [go-nuts] Mapping function name/address to rtype/functype

2017-10-26 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:08 PM, wrote: > > Maybe I have some false assumptions here, but if I had a dynamically-linked > go library that I stripped, how would I be able to use reflection at runtime > when using things from this library. Yes, you are onto something

Re: [go-nuts] Mapping function name/address to rtype/functype

2017-10-26 Thread max . shavrick
Maybe I have some false assumptions here, but if I had a dynamically-linked go library that I stripped, how would I be able to use reflection at runtime when using things from this library. (Does go support making dynamic libraries?) Thank you Max On Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 5:52:49 PM

Re: [go-nuts] Mapping function name/address to rtype/functype

2017-10-26 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 1:34 PM, wrote: > (Hoping this is the right place to ask this...) Yes, this is at any rate one of the right places. > I'm wondering if there's a way to map the function name/address to the > function's rtype/functype on a stripped go binary (at