Dnia 2020-11-11, o godz. 08:01:37
Jeremy French napisał(a):
> I know that's not realistic, and errors are a part of life.
> My point is that they're not the main purpose of the code, and thus shouldn't
> be taking up (up to) 75% of the code space when I'm trying to read what a
> function does.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 5:02 PM Jeremy French wrote:
> *shrug* As you said, returnif is still a statement, and yet it reduces the
> minimum boilerplate from 3 lines down to 1.
>
There's a way to get that without a language change - you can have gofmt
make `if err != nil { return … }` into a 1-li
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 2:09:19 AM UTC-5
axel.wa...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:43 AM Jeremy French wrote:
>
>> I certainly can't speak for the whole community, but for me, the key word
>> here is verbosity. I don't care (too much) whether it's technically a
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:43 AM Jeremy French wrote:
> I certainly can't speak for the whole community, but for me, the key word
> here is verbosity. I don't care (too much) whether it's technically a
> statement or an expression or a macro. What I care about is signal to noise
> ratio in my cod
On Tuesday, November 10, 2020 at 6:12:18 PM UTC-5 axel.wa...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> IMO, `returnif , ` reads awkwardly. If anything, it should
> really be `return if `. At which point it also becomes
> clear that this isn't actually much of an improvement over `if {
> return }`.
>
"retu
IMO, `returnif , ` reads awkwardly. If anything, it should
really be `return if `. At which point it also becomes
clear that this isn't actually much of an improvement over `if {
return }`.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:59 PM Tyler Compton wrote:
> The "try proposal" and some others identified a
Some thoughts:
The "try proposal" and some others identified and solved two problems:
a. The verbosity of using a full if statement to check error values
b. The verbosity of applying wrapping and other error handling logic to
every place where an error is returned
This proposal only addresses Pr
Hm, yep. Very similar. Interestingly, the only cohesive objections I can
see in those threads are to the minor details that are different from what
I'm saying. Still, though - at least the idea has been presented before.
Jeremy French
607-444-1725
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020, 2:57 PM Ian Lance Taylor wr
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 11:20 AM Jeremy French wrote:
>
> First, the caveat. I know error handling is a long-standing discussion. I
> know there has been lots of debate on error handling, and it can seem like
> there are no more new ideas to be had on the topic. And I have looked at
> several
First, the caveat. I know error handling is a long-standing discussion. I
know there has been lots of debate on error handling, and it can seem like
there are no more new ideas to be had on the topic. And I have looked at
several/most of the most popular proposals, and there are quite a few t
10 matches
Mail list logo
