It's easy to focus on the darker turns that thread took, but it also
led to a lot of good discussion.
It got work restarted on https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18517 and
led to the following issues being filed:
- https://github.com/golang/go/issues/21980
-
I am sorry but this type of straw man is not what Nate and others are
arguing for.
Never has anyone suggested we sacrifice quality for quantity but rather
that more better than less to turn the old adage around.
If code review can be done efficiently enough and by enough people then
more
On Thursday, 21 September 2017 04:27:19 UTC+2, Nate Finch wrote:
>
> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/21956
>
> Wherein I suggest that not using GitHub for PRs and Reviews for the Go
> Project itself is hurting the language and the community.
>
I have been lurking on this discussion until
