Re: [go-nuts] UML && Golang, part 2 ?

2021-11-15 Thread alex-coder
After all, I found that plantuml is more suitable for code visualization. If anyone is interested, you will find it there: https://plantuml.com/ Thank all for participation. суббота, 13 ноября 2021 г. в 19:43:20 UTC+3, alex-coder: > Satyendra, > >> https://github.com/ofabry/go-callvis > >

Re: [go-nuts] UML && Golang, part 2 ?

2021-11-13 Thread alex-coder
Satyendra, >> https://github.com/ofabry/go-callvis very interesting, but looks like a little bit out of date. Thank you. воскресенье, 4 июля 2021 г. в 18:57:46 UTC+3, satyendra...@gmail.com: > Alex you can try this. > > https://github.com/ofabry/go-callvis > > Thanks and regards, > Satyendra

Re: [go-nuts] UML && Golang, part 2 ?

2021-07-05 Thread Henry
UML is a design language. You can use it to express ideas and concepts regardless your programming languages, and to communicate those ideas to other people. Just like any other tools, you can use it in your projects as you see fit. Many people have moved into a more agile-like development

Re: [go-nuts] UML && Golang, part 2 ?

2021-07-05 Thread Jeremy French
I wouldn't think that UML is unpopular, so much as it's not as helpful as other languages. UML is especially useful in OOP, which Go is not, at least not specifically. And I also think UML can tend to push you into certain paradigms of thinking or design patterns, whereas maybe Go tends to have

Re: [go-nuts] UML && Golang, part 2 ?

2021-07-05 Thread Vladimir Varankin
For the current system, that concists of <100 µ-services (the whole system is owned by one team), I'm trying to evaluate C4 model https://c4model.com. TBF, this is an ongoing experiment for myself, and I don't try to strictly follow the C4's nomenclature, but I find the idea of zooming-in &

Re: [go-nuts] UML && Golang, part 2 ?

2021-07-04 Thread Tyler Compton
Is it true that UML is unpopular? I don't think you'll catch many gophers writing class diagrams, but I've found higher level UML diagrams useful. That said, I find UML somewhat overspecified for day-to-day use. A simple block diagram is often enough for me to explain something to a coworker or

Re: [go-nuts] UML && Golang, part 2 ?

2021-07-04 Thread satyendra singh
Alex you can try this. https://github.com/ofabry/go-callvis Thanks and regards, Satyendra On Sun, Jul 4, 2021, 9:15 PM alex-coder wrote: > Well, if there is a complex or not very complex system written in a > programming language, > using uml helps faster understand both the system and the

Re: [go-nuts] UML && Golang, part 2 ?

2021-07-04 Thread alex-coder
Well, if there is a complex or not very complex system written in a programming language, using uml helps faster understand both the system and the dependencies and constractions in the code. Especially if the system is unfamiliar. Right ? :-) воскресенье, 4 июля 2021 г. в 14:27:29 UTC+3, Jan

Re: [go-nuts] UML && Golang, part 2 ?

2021-07-04 Thread Jan Mercl
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 1:16 PM alex-coder wrote: > But what do you use instead then ? For what? In case it's not obvious, I never touched UML and I don't really understand its utility. So I'm asking an honest question. Knowing the answer might help to possibly provide some answer to your

[go-nuts] UML && Golang, part 2 ?

2021-07-04 Thread alex-coder
Ok, folk, as I see UML is not very popular within the community. :-) But what do you use instead then ? Anyway it must be some tool to present the code as a picture. The picture is worth a thousand words :-). Thank you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[go-nuts] UML && Golang

2021-06-25 Thread alex-coder
Hi All ! I can't find an IDE that has a conversion tool from Golang code to uml diagrams. I will be very grateful for the link to. You see, the picture is worth a thousand words :-). Thank you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group.