> On Apr 11, 2021, at 12:22, 'Axel Wagner' via golang-nuts
> wrote:
>
> Everything around it certainly emits the air of pretentiousness that the fine
> art market is famous for.
à propos:
FTC Rules Businesses Must Disclose Whether They Actually Cool Or Just Use
Minimalist Branding
https:/
I'm genuinely baffled by the lack of self-awareness on display here.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 7:43 PM Thomas Bushnell BSG
wrote:
> In *Ash Wednesday, *T. S. Eliot wrote the line "Lady, three white
> leopards sat under a juniper tree in the cool of the day" When he was
> asked what it meant, h
In *Ash Wednesday, *T. S. Eliot wrote the line "Lady, three white leopards
sat under a juniper tree in the cool of the day" When he was asked what
it meant, he aisd "It means, 'Lady, three white leopards sat under a
juniper tree in the cool of the day'"
I suspect if there were a better way
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 14:23, K. Alex Mills wrote:
>
> Well I'm convinced this is art, and once it's viewed that way, I think it
> stops being confounding and becomes delightful.
>
> Sending it to my Art History contacts for analysis. Maybe by putting it in
> the proper context we can come to
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 14:18, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> I don't understand what you are trying to say. And I feel the fact that
> everyone talking about is either confused, or speaking in riddles instead of
> just plainly explaining what they are trying to say, speaks for itself.
--
You receiv
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021, 5:15 AM Jesper Louis Andersen <
jesper.louis.ander...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 5:11 AM Kurtis Rader wrote:
>
>>
>> It is nice that the specification allows for an efficient implementation.
>> But I agree with Dan that your documentation is opaque, obtuse,
I don't understand what you are trying to say. And I feel the fact that
everyone talking about is either confused, or speaking in riddles instead
of just plainly explaining what they are trying to say, speaks for itself.
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 1:55 PM Petite Abeille
wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 11, 20
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 12:14, Jesper Louis Andersen
> wrote:
>
> It's an art installation. A lament to the mistakes we've made. The documents
> WE've written. But no-one reads. We revel in the 113 lines of pure
> specification, as a temple to Alan Kay. Documentation must be executable! The
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 05:11, Kurtis Rader wrote:
>
> It is nice that the specification allows for an efficient implementation. But
> I agree with Dan that your documentation is opaque, obtuse, inscrutable, etc.
> So much so that I initially thought it was some sort of April Fools Day joke.
>
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 12:22, 'Axel Wagner' via golang-nuts
> wrote:
>
> Everything around it certainly emits the air of pretentiousness that the fine
> art market is famous for.
There is a method to it:
https://lighthouse-dot-webdotdevsite.appspot.com//lh/html?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftextprotoco
Everything around it certainly emits the air of pretentiousness that the
fine art market is famous for.
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:15 PM Jesper Louis Andersen <
jesper.louis.ander...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 5:11 AM Kurtis Rader wrote:
>
>>
>> It is nice that the specification
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 5:11 AM Kurtis Rader wrote:
>
> It is nice that the specification allows for an efficient implementation.
> But I agree with Dan that your documentation is opaque, obtuse,
> inscrutable, etc. So much so that I initially thought it was some sort of
> April Fools Day joke.
>
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 7:55 PM Petite Abeille
wrote:
> > On Apr 10, 2021, at 00:41, 'Dan Kortschak' via golang-nuts <
> golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> >
> >> [1] https://textprotocol.org
> >
> > That's an extraordinarily and unnecessarily obtuse document.
>
> Quite an achievement indeed
> On Apr 10, 2021, at 00:41, 'Dan Kortschak' via golang-nuts
> wrote:
>
>> [1] https://textprotocol.org
>
> That's an extraordinarily and unnecessarily obtuse document.
Quite an achievement indeed :)
Even though in practice it translates to around ~113 sloc — server side:
https://github.c
> On Apr 10, 2021, at 10:49, Anthony Martin wrote:
>
> They sure are a busy little bee.
>
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26675569
> https://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2021-April/100873.html
Systematic for sure:
https://textprotocol.org/contact
--
You received this mess
Jesper Louis Andersen once said:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 5:37 PM 'Petite Abeille' via golang-nuts <
> golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > Would you know of any go text://protocol clients? Or servers?
> >
> >
> No, but it would be a fairly good beginner project[0]
>
> [0] Readers of the e
On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 17:01 +0200, 'Petite Abeille' via golang-nuts
wrote:
> [1] https://textprotocol.org
That's an extraordinarily and unnecessarily obtuse document.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this gro
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 5:37 PM 'Petite Abeille' via golang-nuts <
golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Would you know of any go text://protocol clients? Or servers?
>
>
No, but it would be a fairly good beginner project[0]
[0] Readers of the erlang-questions@ mailing list would know :P
--
Y
Hello,
Would you know of any go text://protocol clients? Or servers?
Thanks in advance.
[1] https://textprotocol.org
[2] https://github.com/textprotocol/public
[3] https://github.com/textprotocol/publictext
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-n
19 matches
Mail list logo
