On 23/09/22, Ian Davis (m...@iandavis.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, at 11:27 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> I just wanted to respond to this part:
>
> > I suppose my question is (and forgive me if this is a terrifically naive),
> > how can one negotiate the go landscape of commonly used
On 22/09/22, burak serdar (bser...@computer.org) wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 4:27 PM Rory Campbell-Lange
> wrote:
>
> > ...I'm interested to learn how people negotiate interface
> > interchangeability in their programmes as my query above showed a basic
> > misunderstanding of how that
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 7:14 PM 'Dan Kortschak' via golang-nuts <
golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 20:01 -0500, Robert Engels wrote:
> > The world figured out long ago that OO and it’s principles are a
> > better way to go.
>
> This is a very strong assertion (pun not
On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 20:01 -0500, Robert Engels wrote:
> The world figured out long ago that OO and it’s principles are a
> better way to go.
This is a very strong assertion (pun not intended). I heartily disagree
with the claim, particularly when it comes to how OO is implemented by
class-based
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 7:01 PM Robert Engels wrote:
> Exactly. The world figured out long ago that OO and it’s principles are a
> better way to go. The fact that Go is not OO doesn’t make it bad or not
> useful - but the proponents of that state doesn’t make it better.
>
I, for one, disagree
As a follow up, good OO is not easy. It’s not for everyone. If you have a
utility need it’s probably overkill - but so many of the discussions in this
list revolve around people not understanding OO and what it provides.
> On Sep 22, 2022, at 8:01 PM, Robert Engels wrote:
>
>
> Exactly.
Exactly. The world figured out long ago that OO and it’s principles are a
better way to go. The fact that Go is not OO doesn’t make it bad or not useful
- but the proponents of that state doesn’t make it better.
> On Sep 22, 2022, at 7:58 PM, burak serdar wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Sep
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 6:30 PM Robert Engels wrote:
> I would like to understand the reason to type assert but not cast? That is
> an OO design flaw.
>
You can only type-assert an interface. With type-assertion, you are either
checking if the underlying value of an interface is a specific
I would like to understand the reason to type assert but not cast? That is an
OO design flaw.
> On Sep 22, 2022, at 7:24 PM, burak serdar wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 6:08 PM Robert Engels wrote:
>> 100% true. The difficulty when examining a “large” system is that it becomes
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 6:08 PM Robert Engels wrote:
> 100% true. The difficulty when examining a “large” system is that it
> becomes very difficult to understand the relationships. Documentation can
> help but it is not a great substitute for automated tools.
>
> In Java - actually all of OO -
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 4:27 PM Rory Campbell-Lange
wrote:
> This email follows my email yesterday "cannot convert fs.FS zip file to
> io.ReadSeeker (missing Seek)". Thanks very much to those who replied and
> provided solutions.
>
> Following that, I'm interested to learn how people negotiate
100% true. The difficulty when examining a “large” system is that it becomes
very difficult to understand the relationships. Documentation can help but it
is not a great substitute for automated tools.
In Java - actually all of OO - type casting is severely frowned upon - but it
seems a lot
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, at 11:27 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I just wanted to respond to this part:
> I suppose my question is (and forgive me if this is a terrifically
> naive), how can one negotiate the go landscape of commonly used modules
> to re-utilise, where possible, a more commonly
I struggle with the same in any large project. You have to hope they documented
the api very well.
Needless to say I’m not a fan of “duck typing”. It makes a few things easier
and a lot of important things much harder.
> On Sep 22, 2022, at 5:27 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange
> wrote:
>
> This
This email follows my email yesterday "cannot convert fs.FS zip file to
io.ReadSeeker (missing Seek)". Thanks very much to those who replied and
provided solutions.
Following that, I'm interested to learn how people negotiate interface
interchangeability in their programmes as my query above
15 matches
Mail list logo
