That makes sense, thank you! It does make it a little confusing that a
special case was made for pointers to arrays that violates that rule, but
it's a pretty rare use case anyway.
Thanks for pointing this out, it was driving me crazy.
On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 2:47:12 AM UTC-4, Lyuben
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:10 PM, wrote:
>
> The EBNF specifies the syntax, not the behavior. EBNF does not indicate the
> order of evaluation of source code, only the order of characters in the
> source code.
Fair point. In this case it is also intended to indicate the
The EBNF specifies the syntax, not the behavior. EBNF does not indicate the
order *of *evaluation of source code, only the order of characters *in *the
source code.
On Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 6:59:29 PM UTC-4, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:28 PM,