This is what my solution does, except that it uses items associated with
priorities instead of 2 channels. if 2 channels are really needed for some
reason, it is easy to adapt the solution to this.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:12 PM Daniela Petruzalek <
daniela.petruza...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I
The posted diagram isn't correct. Updated the diagram with the new one.
[image: go1.png]
On Saturday, May 25, 2019 at 10:38:42 AM UTC+7, Henry wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Is there any specific use case that this intended behavior is supposed to
> solve? It appears to me that it is
The interfaces that define the contracts should come from a third
package/source. The issue that I suspect you are hitting is that type
identity for interface types is based on the name, not the method set.
This means that, for example with your code below a function
PrintB(StringerB) and another
Do the hashes recorded in go.sum file come from calculating local cached
modules or from sumdb?
When I clone a main module with complete go.sum files from internet and run
"go build",
when internet connects the "go build" will make?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
It's not a bug, FormatterA and FormatterB method has different
signatures, they are not identical, one wants Format(StringerA) other
Format(StringerB), thus your Format type only implements FormatterA
but Print wants a FormatterB.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:55 AM Henry wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled across this weird behavior and I wonder whether this is a bug.
> Here is the simplified version of the problem (Playground link
> https://play.golang.org/p/mch6NQdTpr5):
I believe this is working as intended because a type
If I had to process messages from both high and low priority channels I
would serialise then with a min heap and create a consumer process for the
min heap. The min heap seems to be the canonical way of solving the
priority queues anyway, so I think it makes sense here.
Basically: goroutine 1
Since this is a mailing list, not sure if my comment could be deleted.
If not, please disreguard my reply, it was a case of unchecked presumptions
meets foot-in-mouth-disease ;/
Thanks,
-K
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To
If that's true - and it might well not be - it's a surprise to me. When
launching the language we explicitly made sure NOT to trademark it.
-rob
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:50 AM Gerald Henriksen
wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2019 07:40:52 +1000, you wrote:
>
> >The last sentence of the article is
Hi Steve,
I agree with al Jan said, but wanted to clarify one of the comments a bit,
in case it's not imediately obvious.
All throughout the bit of code I looked at I see things like:
err = incrval.SetValStr(tptoken, errstr, )
if nil != err {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("YDB: Unexpected error
Well, the two enries are listed at the given URI, quite far apart and in
the opposite order.
Could be a mistake or a bureaucratic glitch.
Lucio.
On Friday, 24 May 2019 08:49:18 UTC+2, Rob 'Commander' Pike wrote:
>
> If that's true - and it might well not be - it's a surprise to me. When
>
On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 19:28, Bruno Albuquerque wrote:
> This was my attempt at a channel with priorities:
>
>
> https://git.bug-br.org.br/bga/channels/src/master/priority/channel_adapter.go
>
> Based on the assumption that priorities only make sense if items are
> queued. If they are pulled out
I am a consumer of Go. As far as I am concerned, it has been a wonder of modern
computing. And I have been programming for almost 40 years.
As a cloud computing and data science polyglot, Go has become my go to language
for systems control and critical web “glue” projects. It has been a joy to
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:05 PM wrote:
>
> Is there something else I can try to isolate this (msan and race have not
> been fruitful)? Note our C code has some memory sanity options in it too - we
> have a storage manager in it that on request will over-allocate all requests
> placing the
On Fri, 24 May 2019 01:30:02 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>Well, the two enries are listed at the given URI, quite far apart and in
>the opposite order.
The list is alphabetical.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from
On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 16:25, Bruno Albuquerque wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:50 AM roger peppe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 19:28, Bruno Albuquerque wrote:
>>
>>> This was my attempt at a channel with priorities:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:49 AM Rob Pike wrote:
>
> If that's true - and it might well not be - it's a surprise to me. When
> launching the language we explicitly made sure NOT to trademark it.
>
Go appears to be trademarked, as well as the new design of the Go
logo. Golang doesn't seem to be.
Thankyou for your reply - my responses are embedded below..
On Friday, May 24, 2019 at 1:12:43 AM UTC-4, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:05 AM > wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, after fitting the code with KeepAlive() calls (some
> probably superfluous), the issues and their
Since those C functions are already returning a return code through the
return value and C only has one return, that's not really possible. I could
allocate 4 bytes of C memory, pass the address to that, make the call,
return the value and free the memory - and I will do that if we get to the
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:40 AM roger peppe wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 16:25, Bruno Albuquerque wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:50 AM roger peppe wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 19:28, Bruno Albuquerque wrote:
>>>
This was my attempt at a channel with priorities:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:50 AM roger peppe wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 19:28, Bruno Albuquerque wrote:
>
>> This was my attempt at a channel with priorities:
>>
>>
>> https://git.bug-br.org.br/bga/channels/src/master/priority/channel_adapter.go
>>
>> Based on the assumption that priorities
Hi,
I stumbled across this weird behavior and I wonder whether this is a bug.
Here is the simplified version of the problem (Playground link
https://play.golang.org/p/mch6NQdTpr5):
package main
import (
"fmt"
)
func main() {
str := MyString("World")
var formatter Format
Print(formatter,
I see an easy* way to implement channel priorities in Go2 if that is
desired.
two steps:
step 2: At lines 124 and 153-157 of src/runtime/select.go, an *order of
channel testing* index table is created, then permuted.
It is later visited in order. All that needs doing is to make the index
table
Thankyou Ian,
I did try a few runs with GODEBUG set to "cgocheck=2" and just the "normal"
errors (bad Go heap ptr, and sweep increased allocation) occurred. I'm
assuming I would have seen a different kind of panic if it had detected
something.
Like I mentioned in the last post, we are very
and when you change that "pass a pointer" to "have a shim c-side function
return a uint32 that you just assign on the Go side," what happens?
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 8:52 AM Steven Estes wrote:
> Thankyou Ian,
>
> I did try a few runs with GODEBUG set to "cgocheck=2" and just the
> "normal"
25 matches
Mail list logo
