That makes sense. Thanks for replying.
regards
On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 1:11:35 AM UTC+8 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 7:55 AM Xie Yuchen wrote:
> >
> > I checked with the issue about how to refer no-copy and the check of
> cmd/vet. After checking, I'm curious that
It seems you not interact with data variable in main or other places, so go
automatically drop it
Just add `print(len(data))` or something like this in main function and
binary instantly grow up
пятница, 16 декабря 2022 г. в 10:15:24 UTC+3, Aurora:
> By empty, I mean it didn't actually
Too often people look at one benchmark -- speed in execution to determine
what the best language is. Is Rust better than Go because it can run a
benchmark faster? The problem the original developers were trying to solve
wasn't that C/C++ or other languages couldn't run fast enough, Ken
tinygo now has a "wasi" target that you can try.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:10 PM 'Kevin Chowski' via golang-nuts <
golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I recently learned that WASI (
> https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/docs/WASI-intro.md)
> supports filesystem
I recently learned that WASI
(https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/docs/WASI-intro.md)
supports filesystem abstractions directly for WASM code.
Is there an plan to integrate this into Go?
On Saturday, November 5, 2022 at 5:59:08 AM UTC-6 Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
> On
Thank you for all the insights!
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 at 14:59, Rich wrote:
> Too often people look at one benchmark -- speed in execution to determine
> what the best language is. Is Rust better than Go because it can run a
> benchmark faster? The problem the original developers were trying to
