what you're doing has a term: character assassination.
please take it elsewhere. there are plenty of forums to air your grievances.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:31 PM Space A. wrote:
>
> Another funny thing and I'm glad that you mentioned, is that "Woman Who Go"
> and other known "non-google"
Another funny thing and I'm glad that you mentioned, is that "Woman Who Go"
and other known "non-google" initiatives, as you said, were founded or
co-founded by "developer advocate" Ashley McNamara. I don't know what kind
of contract or collaboration, or relations she had with Google or Google
Thank you Ian, you reply is very much appreciated.
... what if a compiler would do a bit of helping "magic"? I would suspect
it does know that you return a subslice of an allocated array (something
that compiler still sees up the call stack). Would it be possible to put a
code for "This big
I don't know how this works for vscode, but for GoLand you can write your
own syntax-aware custom folding plugin, see this plugin as an example of
how to do it:
https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/9320-advanced-java-folding
This doesn't mean we are not open to new ideas on how to improve the
> Funny thing that today Google has announced "official" store for Go-related
> merch, which in it's essence is a try to take away even an even tiny business
> opportunities for artists who were creating some goods and had a very very
> little outcome on this. Now they will have ZERO.
really?
Thanks! I haven't heard of GoLand before.
Looks like the One Line Returns feature is like an 80% solution, I would
toggle that on all the time.
I'm not sold on completely hiding the error line like you want, but I'll
definitely start a thread with that GoLand dev about how hard it would be
to
Funny thing that today Google has announced "official" store for Go-related
merch, which in it's essence is a try to take away even an even tiny
business opportunities for artists who were creating some goods and had a
very very little outcome on this. Now they will have ZERO.
Well done Google.
Thank you. The explanation really makes sense. I think I should modify the
source code of etcd, or change to another project that is not so hackful.
On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 10:55:39 PM UTC+8, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 6:50 AM Yuan Ting >
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank
>
> Are there any editors that support some kind of customisable collapsing
> behaviour? Where the above code could be collapsed to something like:
>
Might be worth reading, commenting on and/or possibly upvoting this feature
proposal for GoLand?
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/GO-7747
That's cool, having quick actions to do the folding is part way there.
Hehe, I am genuinely looking for a 'try' alternative! I think that an
editor-supported solution would keep everybody happy.
It would let the code be read as if it were written with some syntactic
sugar macro, but the code
On Friday, July 19, 2019 at 1:01:27 AM UTC+8, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:35 AM T L >
> wrote:
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > type Page struct {
> > views uint32
> > }
> >
> > func (page *Page) SetViews(n uint32) {
> > atomic.StoreUint32(, n)
> > }
> >
Inspired from reading
https://github.com/golang/go/issues/32437#issuecomment-50187
After some careful thoughts on various different concerns and criticisms of
the existing proposal, I'd want to give a try from a different approach.
Using the famous example of CopyFile:
func
Ha!
https://github.com/rstuven/vscode-iferrblocks
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:32 AM Jim Robinson
wrote:
> Is it named try? :P
>
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 8:37:53 PM UTC-7, Michael Jones wrote:
>>
>> There is a special “collapse if err != nil blocks plugin for VS code.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:21 AM David Skinner wrote:
>
> It is my opinion that it is only polite to acknowledge corporate sponsors in
> a tangible way.
>
> The problem is if you have only one corporate sponsor. I know for a fact that
> members of the Smythe Group have contributed time to Go
It is my opinion that it is only polite to acknowledge corporate sponsors
in a tangible way.
The problem is if you have only one corporate sponsor. I know for a fact
that members of the Smythe Group have contributed time to Go dev without
compensation. Many other people have also made
Is it named try? :P
On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 8:37:53 PM UTC-7, Michael Jones wrote:
>
> There is a special “collapse if err != nil blocks plugin for VS code.
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:37 PM > wrote:
>
>> Context:
>> 1. Golang can be very verbose, for example checking if err != nil
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:35 AM T L wrote:
>
> For example:
>
> type Page struct {
> views uint32
> }
>
> func (page *Page) SetViews(n uint32) {
> atomic.StoreUint32(, n)
> }
>
> func (page *Page) Views() uint32 {
> return atomic.LoadUint32()
> }
>
> Keith Randall and Ian Lance Taylor
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:35 AM Andrey Tcherepanov
wrote:
>
> > Basically, it's hard to be sure that there isn't any other slice somewhere
> > that might permit references to that trailing memory
>
> Ian, I am kind of curious about this case. I understand that "hard" is not
> "impossible", but
For example:
type Page struct {
views uint32
}
func (page *Page) SetViews(n uint32) {
atomic.StoreUint32(, n)
}
func (page *Page) Views() uint32 {
return atomic.LoadUint32()
}
Keith Randall and Ian Lance Taylor said that atomic.Load is a
memory_order_acquire
> Basically, it's hard to be sure that there isn't any other slice
somewhere that might permit references to that trailing memory
Ian, I am kind of curious about this case. I understand that "hard" is not
"impossible", but still - if I copy the needed part to a smaller array, how
does the GC
see https://go101.org/article/panic-and-recover-more.html for detailed
explanations.
On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 12:52:13 PM UTC+8, ZPL wrote:
>
> Sorry for the bad formatting.
>
> > recover must be called directly by a deferred function
> func logPanic() {
> defer func() {
> if err :=
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 7:24 AM robfig wrote:
>
> I was curious if reducing the capacity of slice makes that memory available
> to be reclaimed?
>
> (1) Reducing capacity using a three-index:
>
> var s = make([]int64, 1e9)
> ... add data to s, keeping a count ..
> s = s[:n:n] // reduce length
Hi Than
Thank you for your fix. I have some curious about the difference between
the main Go compiler and gollvm. I read gollvm's readme and know that the
main difference comes from the efficiency of GC. Is the other difference
causes the symbol undefined reference as you mentioned above? Or
23 matches
Mail list logo
