Impressive now let's see paul allen's gnt
Vào lúc 23:13:31 UTC+7 ngày Thứ Năm, 6 tháng 7, 2023, Alper Akca đã viết:
>
>
> [image: gnt.png]
> I am a beginner in Golang. I made a cli tool for creating a Go project.
> You can easily create a new Go project using the 'gnt create projectName'
>
In addition to Axel's useful info, whenever you are interested in what
escapes to the 'heap', it can be helpful to build with escape analyses
output. Try using "go build -gcflags=-m".
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 8:35:52 PM UTC-4 chris...@meessen.net wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Closure need space
Your use of sync.WaitGroup looks strange. Typically you would expect to
call wg.Add(1) before a goroutine is started, wg.Done() before it returns
and wg.Wait() to ensure all goroutines have completed.
This doesn't seem to be what you're doing.
Consider restructuring to make best use of the
On Thu 6. Jul 2023 at 09:41, Henry wrote:
> 'make' allocates the required memory.
Does it? What about channels and maps?
'len' returns the length.
What’s the “length” of a channel? What’s the “length” of a map?
'cap' returns the capacity.
For maps?
These questions are rhetorical, for
In principle I agree with the sentiment, in the sense this is what you'd
expect from other languages like Python.
However, slices are fundamentally different to maps in Go. Map values
contain a pointer to a mutable data structure (that's why you can't insert
into a zero map - you have to
'make' allocates the required memory. 'len' returns the length. 'cap'
returns the capacity. The underlying implementation may be different, but
the concept is the same. There is no issue with those.
It is common for a collection to have methods such as 'Add', 'Delete', and
'Clear'. The common
Thanks to everyone who reassured me.
I considered posting a set of links from the most popular Golang tutorials
that do not return after calling http.Error(), but then baulked
In any case, thanks once again to all in this thread.
Regards
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 4:13 AM ben...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, setsid combined with cmd.Process.Release() works for me.
My local / specific needs code
is
https://github.com/ITRS-Group/cordial/blob/ad18bfbfa44eff1b9b66408394dd83749da25bb1/pkg/process/process.go#L64
which works well for everything I have thrown at it (on Linux).
On Wednesday, 5 July
It depends a bit on escape analysis. I think the easiest way to reason
about it is to say that they are stored in the `func` value. If the `func`
value escapes, than so do the closed-over variables. If it doesn't (and the
closed-over variables are not otherwise escaped) they don't. At least to an
Oh and FWIW: You are right (in my opinion) that the different things
`clear` does are, well, different. But note that clear is not the only
builtin for which that is the case. `make`, `len` and `cap` all do
different things (to varying degrees) on maps, slices and channels.
That's not necessarily
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 7:49 AM Henry wrote:
> So, if I get this right, clear on map will result in map length equals to
> zero, but clear on slice is only a value-zeroing operation and the slice
> length remains unchanged?
That understanding is correct.
> They seem like two different
11 matches
Mail list logo
