[go-nuts] tbsp - Spoon-feed your table-based tests!

OK, so this is kind of a lark, but to celebrate the new subtesting system in Go 1.7, I fired out a quick lib for executing table-based tests https://github.com/sdboyer/tbsp. The implementation is pretty trivial, so I hardly

Re: [go-nuts] Shiny

Yep, this is one of those nasty, known issues with vendoring right now. this exact issue was first raised on this list here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-nuts/AnMr9NL6dtc/UnyUUKcMCAAJ. We've got a crew coming together soon to address this issue, among many others:

[go-nuts] [ANN] gta - test combinations of deps

hi folks, i've just gotten a new project to a vaguely-working-alpha state (release early, release often!) that facilitates automatically testing combinations of possible dependency versions: https://github.com/sdboyer/gta. it's gps-based (https://github.com/sdboyer/gps), and is at least sorta

Re: [go-nuts] tbsp - Spoon-feed your table-based tests!

wrote: > > On 17/08/16 16:06, Sam Boyer wrote: > > OK, so this is kind of a lark, but to celebrate the new subtesting > > system <https://golang.org/pkg/testing/#hdr-Subtests_and_Sub_benchmarks> > > > in Go 1.7, I fired out a quick lib for executing table-ba

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

I'm don't think that's an accurate summary, at all. On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 3:22:22 AM UTC-4, Jan Mercl wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:01 AM Konstantin Khomoutov < > flat...@users.sourceforge.net > wrote: > > > Please don't miss the monumental heaps of discussions about package >

Re: [go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

Hi Russ - thanks, this is great. I think all of this will be much easier with these discussions happening in the open. On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 5:09:19 PM UTC-4, Russ Cox wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Sam Boyer <samuel@gmail.com > > wrote: > >>

[go-nuts] dep: Roadmap for merging into the toolchain

Hi folks, Since we opened up the dep project in late January, there's been flurry of contributions, which has been great. However, the plans and end goal of dep haven't been entirely clear to everyone. To address that, and help guide contributors, we've put out

Re: [go-nuts] Go += Package Versioning

Unfortunately, the rules also create some new perverse incentives, with some, IMO, nastier failure modes and remediations. That's one of the things i'll be elaborating on in my doc (hopefully) next week. That said, one of the points Russ and i agree on is that dep does allow more