So, if in the foreseeable future I am not going to swap my logging implementation (won't say never) then it would seem to me that I don't need to prematurely use an interface when one is not required. Does that sound correct?
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 5:51:18 AM UTC-7, Ian Davis wrote: > If you need to be able to swap logging implementations then define the > minimum interface you need to be supported and then either directly use the > 3rd party packages you need or write an adapter. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
